In re: Tadd Vassell
| Docket Number | 13-284 |
| Decision Date | 06 May 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
46 cases
-
United States v. Brown
...was previously unavailable." 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2) ; see also id . § 2244(b)(3)(C); In re Hubbard , 825 F.3d at 228 ; In re Vassell , 751 F.3d 267, 270–71 (4th Cir. 2014). In this circuit, making such a prima facie showing requires the movant to meet a relatively low bar, In re Hubbard , 8......
-
Moore v. United States
...two cases from other circuits holding that a court of appeals may deny authorization where the motion is untimely. See In re Vassell, 751 F.3d 267, 270–72 (4th Cir. 2014) ; In re Campbell, 750 F.3d 523, 532 (5th Cir. 2014) (requiring that the motion be clearly untimely). But see In re McDon......
-
In re Henry, 14–12623
...F.3d 739 (requiring a showing that the “applicant should be categorized as ‘mentally retarded’ ”); cf. In re Vassell, 751 F.3d 267, 270–71, 2014 WL 1779039, at *4 (4th Cir. May 6, 2014) (“[W]hile our primary consideration in reviewing a request for authorization in this kind of case is whet......
-
U.S. v. St. Hubert
...on manifest untimeliness, at least in certain circumstances. See In re Williams , 759 F.3d 66, 68–69 (D.C. Cir. 2014) ; In re Vassell , 751 F.3d 267, 271 (4th Cir. 2014) ; In re Lewis , 484 F.3d 793, 798 (5th Cir. 2007) ; In re Hill , 437 F.3d 1080, 1083 (11th Cir. 2006) ; Outlaw v. Sternes......
Get Started for Free