In re Thomas Kaine, An Alleged Fugitive From Great Britain
Decision Date | 01 December 1852 |
Parties | IN RE THOMAS KAINE, AN ALLEGED FUGITIVE FROM GREAT BRITAIN |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Do. No. 29, '51. A. C. MEAGHER Feb., '52, without
and party. effect.
M. COSTIGAN, Const.
A. C. MEAGHER and party. '52, without effect.
Do. 22d Feb., '52. M. COSTIGAN, Const.
By Sub-Inspr. and party.
BOROUGH OF LIVERPOOL, to wit:
Whereas, proof upon oath hath this day been made before me, one of her majesty's justices of the peace for the said borough, that the name, James Featherston, to the within warrant subscribed, is of the handwriting of the justice of the peace within mentioned. I do hereby authorize Martin Meagher, who bringeth to me this warrant, and all other persons to whom it was originally directed, or by whom it may lawfully be executed, and also all constables and other peace officers of the said borough of Liverpool, to execute the same within the said late mentioned borough.
Given under my hand, this 11th day of April, 1851.
R. E. HARVEY.
COUNTY OF WESTMEATH, to wit:
The information and complaint of James Balfe, of Shurock, farmer, taken 5th day of April, in the year of our Lord 1851, before the undersigned, one of her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for said county of Westmeath, who saith, that on this day, (the 5th day of April,) I was ploughing near that part of the land of Cooleen, in said county of Westmeath, which land a man named William Stones had lately been dispossessed of, and about which he had frequently threatened me, and told me a few days since that I might sow it, but that I should not live to reap it. Saith, about the hour of 12 o'clock at noon, on said day, a man named Thomas Cain, or Kain, came up to me when I was ploughing, armed with a case of pistols. On coming up to me he said to me, 'God save you; are you Peter Balfe?' I said, don't you know well I am not, Tom. He then asked, is that Stones' land? I said not; that it was the other side of the ditch. He then asked me, was I warned to have nothing to do with it, (Stones' land,) and I said not, except what I heard from Stones. He then said he came to warn me, and asked had I a prayer-book. I said not. Well, I have one myself; and he took both pistols in one hand, and took a prayer-book out of his pocket and threw it on the ground towards me. I stooped to take it up, and while stooping he fired one of the pistols at me; and on examining my person, I found the mark of a bullet and twenty-seven grains of shot in my side, just under my left arm. He was so close that the powder discolored my coat, and some of the said shot marks was on my left arm. I then jumped up and ran away, and he followed me some distance; he then turned back towards the horses, and I went into John Mularney's house, and sent for the horses. I saw no more of him. I knew him well for some years back, and I kept his prayer-book.
JAMES his X mark. BALFE.
Sworn before me the day and year first mentioned, at Ballentubbe, in said county of Westmeath, this 5th day of April, 1851.
JAMES FEATHERSTON, H.
I certify that the information, copied on the other side hereof, is the original deposition upon which the original warrant has been issued by me for the apprehension of Thomas Kain, charged with shooting at James Balfe, of Shurock, in the county of Westmeath, with intent to murder him, the said James Balfe; and I further certify, that the said copy at the other side hereof is a true copy of said original deposition.
Dated the 25th day of May, 1852.
JAS. FEATHERSTON, H.
One of her Majesty's Justices of the Peace of the county of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States of America v Lui Kin-Hong
...are protected by the very existence of an unbiased hearing before an independent judiciary.In re KaineUNK, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 103, 14 L.Ed. 345 (1852).Inherent in the probable cause standard is the necessity of a determination that the evidence is both sufficiently reliable and of sufficient......
-
Requested Extradition of Kirby, Matter of, s. 96-10068
...Legge sitting as an extradition judge is not exercising "any part of the judicial power of the United States." In re Kaine, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 103, 119, 14 L.Ed. 345 (1852); In re Extradition of Howard, 996 F.2d 1320, 1325 (1st Cir.1993). Consequently, his order is the order of a federal jud......
-
United States ex rel. Carapa v. Curran
... ... Atty., of New York City (James C. Thomas, Asst ... U.S. Atty., of New York City, of ... purpose of obtaining the relator's release from the ... custody of the Commissioner of ... Court in the case of In re Kaine, 14 How. 103, 133 ... (14 L.Ed. 345). In that ... ...
-
Sanders v. United States
...it has become settled in an unbroken line of decisions. Ex parte Kaine, 3 Blatchf. 1, 5—6 (Mr. Justice Nelson in Chambers); In re Kaine, 14 How. 103, 14 L.Ed. 345; Ex parte Cuddy, 40 F. 62, 65 (Cir.Ct.S.D.Cal.1889) (Mr. Justice Field); Frank v. Mangum, 237 U.S. 309, 334, 35 S.Ct. 582, 590, ......