In re Upland Partners, 060906 FED09, 05-16698

• Party Name: In re: UPLAND PARTNERS, Debtor, v. KESSNER DUCA UMEBAYASHI BAIN & MATSUNAGA, Appellee, WILLIAM S. ELLIS, JR., Appellant, and RICHARD B. EMERY; et al., Trustees.
• Judge Panel: Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
• Case Date: June 09, 2006
• Court: United States Courts of Appeals, U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

In re: UPLAND PARTNERS, Debtor,

WILLIAM S. ELLIS, JR., Appellant,

v.

KESSNER DUCA UMEBAYASHI BAIN & MATSUNAGA, Appellee,

and

RICHARD B. EMERY; et al., Trustees.

No. 05-16698

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

June 9, 2006

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted June 5, 2006 ^[**]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge, Presiding 05 -16698, D.C. No. 05-00170-SOM

Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^[*]

We have reviewed appellant’s response to the order to show cause. This appeal is barred by the doctrine of res judicata . See Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Rg’l Planning Agency, 322 F.3d 1064, 1077 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.

---

Notes:

^[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

^[**] This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

---