In re Vescovo Special Grand Jury
Decision Date | 09 August 1979 |
Docket Number | No. Misc. 7357.,Misc. 7357. |
Citation | 473 F. Supp. 1335 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Central District of California |
Parties | In re VESCOVO SPECIAL GRAND JURY. |
Dennis Schloss, Special Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Los Angeles, Cal., for United States.
A. Wallace Tashima, James A. Dumas, Jr., Morrison & Foerster, Los Angeles, Cal., for Crocker Nat. Bank.
WM. MATTHEW BYRNE, Jr., District Judge.
On December 18, 1978, a grand jury subpoena duces tecum was served on the custodian of records of Crocker National Bank (hereafter "Crocker"), calling for production of certain financial records of a bank depositor. Attached to the subpoena was a letter from Dennis Schloss, Special Attorney, United States Department of Justice, stating that the custodian of records was not to disclose for ninety days the existence of the request for the records in question, because such disclosure would impede the grand jury's investigation and interfere with the enforcement of the law.
Attorneys for Crocker telephoned Mr. Schloss and stated their view that California law required disclosure of the subpoena to the depositor.1 The government responded that California law does not control federal grand jury subpoenas, and that failure to honor the confidentiality condition contained in the letter could constitute a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 or § 1510, the federal obstruction of justice statutes.
Crocker contends that the government's requirement of non-disclosure renders the subpoena unreasonable and oppressive, because it placed Crocker in the position of choosing between criminal liability for disclosure to the depositor and civil liability to the depositor for failure to disclose. Crocker moves to quash the subpoena or, in the alternative, for an order making withdrawal of the confidentiality requirement a condition of the bank's obligation to comply with the subpoena.
Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides, in pertinent part:
(emphasis added)
The Advisory Committee Note to Subdivision (e) states:
Under Rule 6(e) no obligation of secrecy may be imposed upon grand jury witnesses. In re Investigation Before April, 1975 Grand Jury, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 268, 274-75 n.11, 531 F.2d 600, 606-07 n.11 (1976); In re Grand Jury Summoned October 12, 1970, 321 F.Supp. 238, 240 (N.D.Ohio 1970). Witnesses may be interviewed after their appearance and repeat what they said before the grand jury or relate any knowledge they have on the subject of the inquiry. In re Grand Jury Summoned October 12, 1970, supra, 321 F.Supp. at 240, and cases cited therein.2
Any reasons for a secrecy requirement, including the government's attempt to prevent subornation of perjury, suppression of evidence, or falsification of documents, would apply with equal force to the presentation of oral testimony as to the production of documentary evidence. See United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 n.6, 78 S.Ct. 983, 2 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1958)....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Kilpatrick
... ... grand juries, the instant proceeding was commenced on September 30, 1982 by the ... whether prosecutorial misconduct and irregularities in the grand jury" process constituted additional grounds for dismissal ... \xC2" ... Mendrop and Raybin, Special Agents assigned by the IRS to assist the prosecutors. 2 Several months ... 531 F.2d 600; In re Vescovo Special Grand Jury (1979) 473 F.Supp. 1335, and many other cases. In ... ...
-
First Amend. Coalition v. JUD. INQUIRY & REV. BD.
... ... , pursuant to a legal opinion prepared at Board request by special counsel Perry S. Bechtle, Esq., that article V, section 18(h) of the ... this sense the hearing conducted by the Board may be analogized to a grand jury proceeding leading to possible indictment. Once upon a time it was ... 531 F.2d 600; In re Vescovo ... ...
-
In re Doe, Misc. No. 82-38.
... 537 F. Supp. 1038 ... In re John DOE Grand Jury Proceedings ... Misc. No. 82-38 ... United States District ... See In re Special February 1975 Grand Jury, 662 F.2d 1232, 1243 (7th Cir. 1981) (2-1 ... 1061, 1066 (D.Colo.1981); In re Vescovo Special Grand Jury, 473 F.Supp. 1335, 1336 (C.D. Cal.1979). But see In ... ...
-
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, A98-0031 MI (JKS).
... ... The Court is of the view that this action falls precisely within the parameters of this test. See Matter of Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589, 591 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046, 99 S.Ct. 721, 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978) (prior compliance with grand ... The district court ultimately concluded that it was for the banks to decide on an ad hoc basis what they wished to do. See also In re Vescovo Special Grand Jury, 473 F.Supp. 1335 (C.D.Cal.1979) ... Financial institutions in Alaska are presented with a similar dilemma ... ...