In re Walker Grain Co.
Decision Date | 04 December 1923 |
Docket Number | 4206. |
Citation | 295 F. 120 |
Parties | In re WALKER GRAIN CO. [1] v. WILKINSON. FARMERS' & MECHANICS' NAT. BANK |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Rehearing Denied January 15, 1924.
J. A Templeton and Clay Cooke, both of Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner and appellant.
Stanley Boykin, H. C. Ray, and Geo. M. Connor, all of Fort Worth Tex. (Geo. M. Connor, Capps, Cantey, Hanger & Short, and Boykin & Ray, all of Fort Worth, Tex., on the brief), for respondent and appellee.
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
By petition to revise and also by appeal Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank of Fort Worth, Tex. (herein called the bank), seeks the review of an order of the court affirming an order of the referee in bankruptcy sustaining a motion made by the trustee in bankruptcy of the Walker Grain Company that the bank be required by summary order to restore to the trustee a specified sum of money belonging to the bankrupt's estate paid to the bank after the filing of the petition in bankruptcy on a note of the bankrupt to the bank, with interest thereon from the date of such payment. Walker Grain Company was adjudged bankrupt on an involuntary petition filed against it on August 16, 1918. The referee appointed a receiver of the estate of the alleged bankrupt in pursuance of an application of the petitioning creditors filed on August 22, 1918. The bankrupt was enabled to retain possession of its property after the appointment of the receiver and after the bankruptcy adjudication by virtue of stays granted upon the execution of supersedeas bonds successively given on an unsuccessful petition to revise the order of the referee appointing a receiver, on an unsuccessful appeal to this court from the order of the court affirming such order of the referee, and on an unsuccessful appeal to this court from the bankruptcy adjudication. The following are the referee's findings with reference to the bank:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Williams
...acquired such possession that a summary proceeding may be employed. Gamble v. Daniel (C. C. A.) 39 F.(2d) 447, 453; In re Walker Grain Co. (C. C. A.) 295 F. 120, 122; Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox, 264 U. S. 426, 432, 433, 44 S. Ct. 396, 68 L. Ed. 770; May v. Henderson, 268 U. S. 111, ......
-
In re Retail Stores Delivery Corporation
...Kane (D. C.) 131 F. 386; In re Michaelis & Lindeman (D. C.) 196 F. 718; Reed v. Barnett Nat. Bank (C. C. A.) 250 F. 983; In re Walker Grain Co. (C. C. A.) 295 F. 120; In re Times Square Auto Supply Co. (C. C. A.) 47 F.(2d) 210, 212; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Daniel (C. C. A.) 49 F.(2d) 866. The......
-
Farmers Mechanics Nat Bank v. Wilkinson
...by an order of the District Court, and its order was affirmed upon petition to revise by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (295 F. 120), and this court denied a petition for certiorari (264 U. S. 588, 44 S. Ct. 402, 68 L. Ed. 864). After the mandate had gone down to the District Co......
-
In re Times Square Auto Supply Co.
...decisions of other circuits, as well as in a later case of our own. Reed v. Barnett Nat. Bank, 250 F. 983 (C. C. A. 5); In re Walker Grain Co., 295 F. 120 (C. C. A. 5), certiorari denied, 264 U. S. 588, 44 S. Ct. 402, 68 L. Ed. 864; Gamble v. Daniel, 39 F.(2d) 447 (C. C. A. 8); In re Columb......