In re Walsh
Decision Date | 16 June 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 6876.,6876. |
Citation | 19 F. Supp. 567 |
Parties | In re WALSH. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota |
John H. Horeish, of St. Paul, Minn., for bankrupt.
Lewis E. Solomon, of St. Paul, Minn., for trustee.
Oscar Hallam, of St. Paul, Minn., for a creditor.
This matter came before the court on two petitions for review of an order made by the referee in bankruptcy filed February 24, 1937. On March 5, 1937, a creditor filed with the referee his petition for review of said order, and on March 6, 1937, the bankrupt filed her petition for review thereof.
The bankrupt appeared by her attorney, Mr. John H. Horeish; the trustee appeared by his attorney, Mr. Lewis E. Solomon; and a creditor appeared by his attorney, Mr. Oscar Hallam.
The matter came before the referee upon the written stipulation of the bankrupt and the trustee by their respective attorneys for the determination of the bankrupt's claim of exemption with respect to certain so-called retirement annuity contracts and the claim of the trustee to the cash surrender value of such contracts, and for amendment of the schedules heretofore filed herein by the bankrupt to include such contracts as assets claimed exempt by the bankrupt. The referee made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
These policies are designated as retirement annuities. The bankrupt is referred to therein as the annuitant. In brief, they provide for a stipulated amount to be paid to the society from the date of the contract until the annuitant shall become sixty years of age. The society agrees to pay to the annuitant beginning at the age of sixty a life annuity in a stipulated monthly amount. If the annuitant should die before reaching the age of sixty, the society agrees to pay to the sister of the annuitant, or such other person as annuitant may designate, a specified sum in accordance with the schedules contained therein. The annuitant has the option, to be exercised before the annuity payments begin, of electing in lieu of the annuity payments to commence at the age of sixty (1) a life annuity beginning approximately ten years after the policy is issued, according to the schedule of payments attached to the contract, or (2) a refund annuity beginning at the same age. Under the refund annuity, if annuitant dies before she has received in annuity payments a stipulated sum, the annuity payments are to be continued to the named beneficiary until such stipulated sum is paid in full.
The schedule which sets forth the payments to the beneficiary in the event the annuitant dies before any annuity payments are due provides that where the annual premium payment is $100, the beneficiary would receive $91 in case of the annuitant's death during the contract's first year. At the tenth year, the payment is $1,062 to the beneficiary, the annuitant having paid in $1,000. The amount payable is increased each year, until the twentieth year when $2,000 would have been paid to the society, the death benefit is $2,561. This latter sum would represent the premiums paid by the annuitant plus something less than 3 per cent. interest per annum on the premiums paid from year to year to the society. There are options on surrender or lapse and provisions for participation in the distribution of the divisible surplus of the society. The cash surrender value of the three policies at the time of adjudication, less loans made to the annuitant, totals $820.61.
If the available proceeds of these contracts as of the date of adjudication are exempt under the Minnesota law, then it is clear that the cash surrender value did not become an asset of the bankrupt's estate. Holden v. Stratton, 198 U.S. 202, 25 S.Ct. 656, 49 L.Ed. 1018.
In order to determine whether or not the referee's disposition of the question is correct, resort must be had to the statutes of Minnesota and a construction of the annuity contracts in light thereof. The only pertinent statute in the state dealing with exemptions of insurance is section 3387 of Mason's Minnesota Statutes 1927, which is entitled, "Who Entitled to Proceeds of Life Policy." It provides:
Section 3388 is entitled, "Exemption in Favor of Family — Change of Beneficiary." It reads:
Section 3314 defines insurance as follows:
It is evident that the exemption contemplated by section 3387 refers to life insurance. This section was first enacted in 1895, being section 71 of chapter 175 of the Session Laws of that year which was entitled: "An act to revise and codify the insurance laws of the state." The pertinent portion of the original act reads as follows:
The statute in its present form first appeared in the Revised Laws of Minnesota of 1905 (section 1691). It was first construed in Murphy v. Casey, 150 Minn. 107, 184 N.W. 783. Plaintiff therein was a judgment creditor of the insured and sought to levy upon the insured's alleged interest in three twenty-year payment plan life insurance policies with cash surrender options. The policies were payable to insured's mother with the right of the insured, however, to change the beneficiary at any time. All of the policies provided that, in the event the designated beneficiary should not be living at the death of the insured, the amounts due at his death should become payable to his heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns in the event no other beneficiary had been designated prior to insured's death. In determining the right of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gulf Oil Corp.. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...to a life insurance contract is agreed by courts and commentators. See for example: Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 169 U.S. 139; In re Walsh, 19 F. Supp. 567; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 314; Ackerman v. Commissioner, 15 B.T.A. 635; Couch, Cyclopedia of Insurance, Vol. I,......
-
Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. Rainey
... ... effected in the manner provided in the Statute of Wills. Sec ... 520, R.S. 1939; Ellison v. Straw, 119 Wis. 502, 97 ... N.W. 168; Uhlman v. New York Life Ins. Co., 17 N.E ... 363; Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal ... Revenue, 102 F.2d 380; In re Walsh, 19 F.Supp ... 567; State ex rel. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. v ... Hahn, 88 P.2d 484; State v. Equitable Life Assur ... Soc. of U.S., 282 N.W. 411; Hall v. Metropolitan ... Life Ins. Co., 28 P.2d 875; Commonwealth v. Met ... Life Ins. Co., 98 A. 1072; Reece v. Sec. Ben ... Assn., ... ...
-
State ex rel. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Lucas
... ... Mut. Life Ins ... Co., 47 P.2d 1079; Wellman v. Board, 252 P ... 193; Chisholm v. Shields, 66 N.E. 93; Parson v ... Powell, 9 Bing. 320; Old Colony Trust Co. v. Comr ... of Int. Rev., 37 B. T. A. 435, affirmed 102 F.2d 380; ... Moskowitz v. Davis, 68 F.2d 818; In re ... Walsh, 19 F.Supp. 567; Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v ... Comr., 37 B. T. A. 535; Cannon v. Nicholas, 80 ... F.2d 935; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Comr., 16 B. T. A ... 314; Schultz v. Comr., 38 B. T. A. 59; In re ... Sothern's Estate, 14 N.Y.S. (2d) 1; Lynch v ... Houston, 138 Mo.App. 167; ... ...
-
Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. v. Clark
...States, 29 F.Supp. 860, 865-66, 89 Ct.Cl. 507 (1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 675, 60 S.Ct. 711, 84 L.Ed. 1019 (1940); In re Walsh, 19 F.Supp. 567, 571-75 (D.Minn.1937); In re Sothern's Estate, 257 A.D. 574, 14 N.Y.S.2d 1, 3-4 (1939); In re Rhodes' Estate, 197 Misc. 232, 94 N.Y.S.2d 406, 411......