In re Welfare of D.C.D., (1999)

Decision Date31 August 1999
Docket NumberPOR-C-5/88-64
PartiesIN RE THE WELFARE OF D.C.D., AN INDIAN YOUTH
CourtPort Gamble Sklallam Tribal Court of Appeals

SUMMARY

The Court of Appeals holds that the trial court abused its discretion when it granted an emergency custody order granting custody of a youth to his maternal grandmother, when the youth's health, safety, and welfare were not seriously endangered, and the youth was not found to be in need of care.In addition, the Court found that Appellant had not received adequate notice when he was served with a notice of hearing only one day before the scheduled hearing; was not served with a summons; nor served a copy of the Request for Emergency Custody Order; and had no notice as to the subject matter of the hearing.Order vacated.

Mr. J Doe[1] , Appellant; Richard Guest, attorney for Appellant; Ms. K. Jones, Respondent.

Before: Lorintha Warwick, Chief Justice; Clifford L Marshall, Justice; and Douglas Luna, Justice.

THIS MATTER came before the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribal Court of Appeals pursuant to a notice of appeal filed by AppellantMr. J. Doe, on September 3, 1998.Mr. Doe appeals the July 29, 1998, Custody Order which grants custody of his son D.C.D., to Ms. K. Jones, the boy's maternal grandmother and the Respondent in this matter.

I.BACKGROUND

D.C.D. was born in 1986 to Appellant, J. Doe, and R. Jones, daughter of K. Jones.Mr. Doe is an enrolled member of the Skokomish Indian Tribe.Ms. R. Jones was an enrolled member of the Port Gamble S'Klallam Indian Tribe, as is her mother, K. Jones.The dual enrollment issues regarding D.C.D. have not been resolved.

R. Jones died in an automobile accident in February of 1988.On August 19, 1988, the Port Gamble S'Klallam tribal court issued an Order of Indian Guardianship which placed legal guardianship of D.C.D. with his maternal grandmother, K. Jones.

In February of 1992, Mr. Doe moved to terminate the guardianship.In a March 17, 1992, order, the trial court ordered that D.C.D. remain with his grandmother, but established a visitation schedule with his father to allow a gradual transition from his grandmother's home to his father's home on the Skokomish Indian Reservation.

In May 1993, Mr. Doe again moved the court for an order terminating the 1988 Guardianship Order.By order dated September 7, 1993, the trial court granted Mr. Doe's motion; D.C.D.'s guardianship was placed with his father and his grandmother was allowed unlimited visitation.The court's order also provided:

. . . if the youth decided that he would rather return to the care of [K. Jones], [J. Doe] must respect and grant the youths [sic] wishes by notifying this court.

Ms. Jones appealed the Termination of Guardianship to the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribal Court of Appeals.In December 1993, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the matter for rehearing.Pursuant to a hearing on remand, the trial court issued a February 23, 1994, order terminating the Guardianship Order and placing legal custody of D.C.D. with his father.Ms. Jones was granted temporary physical custody of D.C.D. for the remainder of the 1994 school term.Mr. Doe was required to notify the court of any requests D.C.D. made regarding a desire to return to the home and custody of his grandmother.D.C.D. went to live with his father on the Skokomish Indian Reservation at the end of the 1994 school year.He continued to visit his grandmother on the scheduled alternating weekends, holidays, and summer vacations.

On July 22, 1998, Ms. Jones filed a Request for Emergency Custody Order Hearing with the trial court based upon the allegation that D.C.D. had expressed a desire to live with her.On July 27, 1998, the trial court entered a Notice of Hearing for a hearing to take place on July 29, 1998.Mr. Doe received the Notice on July 28, 1998.There is no evidence in the record, however, that Mr. Doe was served with a copy of Ms. Jones' request for the hearing.

According to the transcript of the July 29 hearing, Mr. Doe had no notice as to the subject of the hearing and requested additional time to talk to his son.At that hearing, Mr. Doerequested a continuance to allow him the opportunity to retain counsel and to prepare a response to the emergency petition.In a Custody Order dated July 29, 1998, the trial court denied his request and granted custody of D.C.D. to his grandmother.

II.DISCUSSION

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex