In re Wyman
Decision Date | 23 September 2019 |
Docket Number | Case No. 12-32264-dof |
Parties | IN RE: CHRISTOPHER D. WYMAN, Debtor. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Michigan |
Chapter 7 Proceeding
Hon. Daniel S. Opperman
Special Counsel for the Chapter 7 Trustee requests the Court to issue an order to pay his attorney fees. The Trustee objects to this request for numerous reasons. For the reasons stated in this Opinion, the Court concludes that Special Counsel is entitled to no more than $21,869.33, less amounts attributed to the Trustee's efforts to complete the sale of assets and subordination of claims for the benefit of the estate.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b), 157(a) and 157(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 83.50(a). This is a core proceeding pursuant to 27 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) ( ).
Shortly after the Debtor filed his Chapter 7 Petition, Michael Tindall, who represented Barbara Duggan, a creditor of the Debtor, contacted the Chapter 7 Trustee, Michael Mason, to inform him about possible avoidable transfers of real and personal property of the Debtor. Mr. Mason was already represented by counsel, but he reached an understanding with Mr. Tindall to allow Mr. Tindall and his law firm, Tindall Law Firm, (collectively "Tindall") to represent Mr. Mason and the estate as special counsel for a limited purpose. Accordingly, Mr. Mason, through counsel, filed an Application for Approval of Employment of Tindall Law Firm as Special Counsel for the Estate on July 16, 2012 ("Application"). Pertinent portions of this Application state:
The Declaration of Disinterestedness of the Tindall Law Firm was attached to the Application and states in part:
3. The Trustee's application to employ has been read by the Tindall Law Firm and the law firm agrees to accept said employment on the terms and conditions contained in the Trustee's Application.
This Declaration was signed by Mr. Tindall. After approval of the employment by the United States Trustee, the Court entered an Order Approving Application for Employment of Tindall Law Firm as Special Counsel for the Estate on July 18, 2012 ("Employment Order"). The Employment Order states:
Tindall filed adversary proceedings to avoid the transfer of real estate located at 1011 Jones Road, Howell, Michigan and assorted construction machinery, equipment, tools, and miscellaneous items ("Personal Property") on behalf of the estate and Ms. Duggan. The Defendants in these actions aggressively defended these adversary proceedings, resulting in protracted and contentious litigation.
Ultimately, however, through negotiations by Samuel Sweet the successor Trustee to Mr. Mason, 1101 Jones Road was returned to the Trustee, as well as some of the Personal Property. Mr. Sweet then sold 1011 Jones Road for a net amount of $65,607.98 and included the Personal Property as part of the settlement of the adversary proceedings. But Tindall did not see this result to the end. On September 20, 2017, Mr. Tindall was disbarred and therefore unable to representMr. Sweet. Despite that set back, Mr. Sweet brought these assets into the estate, settled the adversary proceedings, and sold 1011 Jones Road.
Mr. Tindall reappeared as an interested party to contest the sale of 1011 Jones Road, this time as a partial assignee of Ms. Duggan's claim and later on his own behalf as a claimant for his attorney fees and costs. Mr. Sweet has closed the sale of 1011 Jones Road, disbursed funds to Ms. Duggan, and negotiated a subordination of tax claim with Livingston County that created funds to pay administrative claims. Mr. Tindall has one of these administrative claims. To that end, Mr. Tindall has filed two documents: a Notice of Claim of Interest ("Notice") and the Application.
The Notice states:
NOTICE OF CLAIM OF INTEREST
In turn, the Application states that 1011 Jones Road sold for $65,000.00, that Ms. Duggan had an allowed secured claim of $32,288.91, which Mr. Sweet paid, that Ms. Duggan has paid post petition attorney fees of $28,642.93 which Mr. Tindall apparently asserts she should be paid as a secured creditor under Section 506(b), and that Mr. Sweet currently holds $31,904.82 subject to his fees. Finally, Mr. Tindall asserts that he is entitled to a 1/3 contingency fee of $34,410.00 based on values determined by Mr. Sweet.
Mr. Sweet disputes that Mr. Tindall is entitled to $34,000.00 because his efforts and the result do not warrant such award. Moreover, Mr. Sweet argues that Mr. Tindall has a conflict of interest given his representation of Ms. Duggan and that his claim that she is entitled to attorney fees is unwarranted and is in conflict with Mr. Tindall's and the estate's interest. Moreover, Mr. Sweet pointed out that 1/3 of $65,607.98 is $21,869.33, not $34,100.00.
To continue reading
Request your trial