In re Young
Decision Date | 08 August 2008 |
Docket Number | No. 08-10012-WCH.,08-10012-WCH. |
Citation | 392 B.R. 6 |
Parties | In re Darrin W. YOUNG, Debtor. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Massachusetts |
Michael J. Splaine, Attorney at Law, Salem, MA, for Debtor.
The matters before the Court are the Objection to Confirmation of Amended Chapter 13 Plan filed by eCAST Settlement Corporation ("eCAST"), as an agent for FIA Card Services, a/k/a Bank of America (the "Objection"), and the Response filed by Darrin W. Young (the "Debtor"). eCAST objects to the Debtor's plan asserting, inter alia, that the Debtor has understated his projected disposable income by claiming expense deductions on Form 22C to which he is not entitled. For the reasons set forth below, I will enter an order overruling the Objection.
The Debtor filed a voluntary Chapter 13 petition with all schedules on January 2, 2008. On February 28, 2008, he filed an Amended Chapter 13 Statement of Current Monthly Income and Calculation of Commitment Period and Disposable Income ("Form 22C"). On line 20 of Form 22C, the Debtor reported current monthly income of $4,828.43. This is consistent with the current monthly gross income reported on his Schedule I-Current Income of Individual Debtor(s) ("Schedule I"). Line 21 of Form 22C reflects that the Debtor's annualized current monthly income is $57,941.16. Because this amount exceeds the applicable median family income for debtors in this state, specifically $51,176, the Debtor is an above median income debtor with an applicable commitment period of five years pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(4). As an above median income debtor, he was then required to calculate his "disposable income" with reference to the deductions allowed under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2) using National and Local Standards of the Internal Revenue Service (the "Local Standards"). The following table summarizes and compares the deductions claimed on Form 22C to his monthly expenses as reflected in Schedule J—Current Expenditures of Individual Debtor(s) ("Schedule J").
Expense Schedule J Form 22C Expense Deduction Line T1 Rent/Mortgage Payment $850 $1,144 Mortgage/Rent Expense Line 25B __________ T2 Electricity/Heating Fuel $280 $477 Housing and Utilities; Non-Mortgage Expenses Line 25A _________ T3 Telephone $65 T4 Cable $12 T5 Home Maintenance $100 __________ T6 Food $500 $494 Food, Apparel, Housekeeping Supplies, Personal Line 24A ___________ T7 Clothing $100 Care, and Misc T8 Laundry/Dry/Cleaning $40 T9 Recreation $200 __________ T10 Medical/Dental $54 $54 Out-of-Pocket Health Care Line 24B T11 Transportation $220 $412 Vehicle Operation/Public Transportation Expense Line 27A T12 Charitable Contributions $20 $20 Charitable Contributions Line 45 T13 Auto Insurance $150 N/A* T14 Auto Payment $296 $296 Secured Payment for Vehicle 1 Line 47 T15 Time Share Fee $75 N/A T16 Storage $82 $82 Storage Line 60b T17 Health Club $49 $49 HealthClub Line 60a T18 $182 Transportation Ownership Expense - Vehicle 1 Line 28 T19 $182 Transportation Ownership Expense - Vehicle 2 Line 29 T20 Taxes (Schedule I) $1,412.18 $1,412.18 Taxes Line 30 ___________ T21 "Insurance" (Schedule I) $12.52 $72.22 Health Insurance Line 39 ___________ T22 "Med Pretax" (Schedule I) $62.24 T23 "Vision" (Schedule I) $3.46 ____________ T24 $9.40 Chapter 13 Administrative Expense Line 50 T25 401k (Schedule I) $144.86 $0** Qualified Retirement Deduction Line 55 T26 Life Insurance (Schedule I) $6.41 $0** Personal Life Insurance Line 32 _______________________ ________ T27 Total Expenses $4,734.67 $5,181.80 Total Deductions Line 52***
As reflected on line T1 of the above table, the Debtor claimed a rental expense deduction of $1,144.00, the full amount available under the IRS "Local Standards: housing and utilities; mortgage/rent expense" (the "IRS Housing Standards").1 Schedule J indicates, however, that the Debtor's monthly rent payment is only $850, $294 less than the claimed deduction.2
On Form 22C, the Debtor claims an "ownership expense" for two vehicles. On Schedule B—Personal Property, the Debtor discloses ownership interests in a 1997 Ford F-150 Pickup with trailer (the "150") and a 2006 Harley Motorcycle (the "Harley"). Schedule D—Creditors Holding Secured Claims ("Schedule D"), reveals that there is a lien against the Harley and that the F-150 is not subject to liens. On line 28(a) of Form 22C, the Debtor claims an expense of $478 under the "IRS Transportation Standards, Ownership Costs" (the "IRS Transportation Standards") reduced on line 28(b) by his average monthly payment of $296 for a debt secured by "Vehicle 1," in this case the Harley, for a net ownership expense of $182 on line 28(c).3 On line 29, he again claims an expense under the IRS Transportation Standards in the amount of $478 for "Vehicle 2," presumably for the F-150.4 Consistent with Schedule D, this expense is not reduced by any secured debt payment on the vehicle.5 On line 47(a), the Debtor claims an additional expense related to the Harley as a future payment on a secured claim in the amount of $296 per month.6
The total of all deductions claimed by the Debtor, as listed on line 52 of Form 22C, is $5,050.80. This total, however, does not include the $131 in additional expense claims listed on line 60.7 Including these expenses, the new total is $5,181.80.8 When this amount is subtracted from the Debtor's current monthly income of $4,828.43, it yields monthly disposable income of negative $353.37. Despite negative monthly disposable income as calculated under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(3) on Form 22C, Schedule J reveals that the Debtor has actual monthly net income of $93.76.
The Debtor's First Amended Chapter 13 Plan (the "Plan"), filed contemporaneously with Form 22C, provides for monthly payments of $94 over a term of sixty months. Through the Plan, the Debtor does not provide for payment of any secured or priority claims, although he proposes to pay TD Banknorth directly outside the plan on account of a claim secured by the Harley. In addition to an administrative claim in the amount of $1,274 for Debtor's counsel's fees, the Debtor proposes to pay the holders of general unsecured claims a dividend of not less than 7.55%, totaling $50,371.16.
eCAST, the holder of over 75% of the total value of unsecured claims filed in this case, filed the Objection on the grounds that the Debtor fails to devote all of his projected disposable income received during the commitment period to the unsecured creditors, and that the amount of property to be received under the Plan is less than the amount of its claim. eCAST's objection asserts, inter alia, that the Debtor's projected disposable income is understated due to the Debtor's claiming of "phantom" expense deductions to which he is not entitled. The Debtor filed a general response disputing eCAST's allegations.
I conducted a hearing on the Objection on May 15, 2008. At the conclusion of oral arguments, I took the matter under advisement. Afterwards, both parties, as well as the Chapter 13 trustee (the "Trustee"), filed briefs.
eCAST
As stated above, eCAST asserts that the Debtor understated his projected disposable income on Form 22C by taking deductions to which he is not entitled. eCAST agrees that the Debtor properly determined the current monthly income component of the disposable income calculation, but contends that the sum of his expense deductions on Form 22C is properly calculated to be $3,800.80, not the $5,050.80 stated. Specifically, eCAST asserts that the Debtor's housing expense deduction is overstated and that he is not entitled to expense deductions with respect to his two vehicles.
From the outset, eCAST urges that I be mindful of the guidance that the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit expressed in Kibbe v. Sumski9 There, the Panel concluded that Congress' primary intent in enacting the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("BAPCPA") was to "ensure that debtors repay creditors the maximum they can afford."10 As such, eCAST argues that above median income debtors are required to use the means test expenses, with appropriate...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Coffin
...(Bankr.D.Ariz.2008); In re Weiderhold, 381 B.R. 626 (Bankr.M.D.Pa.2008); In re White, 382 B.R. 751 (Bankr.C.D.Ill.2008); In re Young, 392 B.R. 6 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008); In re Barrett, 371 B.R. 855 (Bankr.S.D.Ill.2007); In re Billie, 367 B.R. 586 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 2007); In re Briscoe, 374 B.R. 1......
-
Coffin v. Ecast Settlement Corp..
...much conflicting case law as well as discussion of differing theories of statutory construction. 11 See, e.g., id.; In re Young, 392 B.R. 6, 22 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008) (explaining that it was “loathe to characterize [ ] § 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) as clear or unambiguous in light of the vast amount o......
-
In re Burbank
...split of authority on this point would be an understatement." In re Coffin, 396 B.R. 804, 807 (Bankr.D.Me.2008). See also, In re Young, 392 B.R. 6 (Bankr. D.Mass.2008) (discussing the division of authority, the various rationales advanced by courts, and concluding that no clear majority vie......
-
In re Marshall
...Lane, 394 B.R. 248 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2008) (Chapter 13 debtor may claim phantom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright); In re Young, 392 B.R. 6 (Bankr. D.Mass.2008) (same); In re Hayes, 376 B.R. 55 (Bankr.D.Mass.2007) (Chapter 7 debtors were entitled to deduct from their current monthly ......
-
James P. Terpening Iii, All or Nothing: Properly Deducting Vehicle Ownership Expenses Under Sec. 707(b)(2)(a)(ii)(i)
...and the means test is used to determine whether debtors have the ability to repay a sufficient portion of their debt. See In re Young, 392 B.R. 6, 21 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2008) (recognizing this distinction and ultimately permitting the deduction); In re Briscoe, 374 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Colo. 200......
-
Chapter III. Facilitating Effective Access to Bankruptcy
...(last visited Jan. 21, 2019). [453] See, e.g., In re O’Neill Miranda, 449 B.R. 182 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2011); In re Young, 392 B.R. 6 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2008).[454] See § 1325(b)(3) (incorporating § 707(b)(2)(b)(2)(A)(iii)(I) into chapter 13 in determining the disposable income of above-median deb......