In re Yunghauss

Decision Date26 January 1914
Citation210 F. 545
PartiesIn re YUNGHAUSS.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

William Blau, of New York City, for petitioner.

H Snowden Marshall, U.S. Atty., and J. E. Walker, Asst. U.S Atty., both of New York City, opposed.

MAYER District Judge.

The petitioner made his declaration of intention to become a citizen before the Supreme Court of the state of New York on April 19, 1905. He filed in this court his petition for admission to become a citizen on October 3, 1913.

The question is whether the petition should be denied because more than seven years have elapsed between the time of the making of the declaration of intention and the presentation of the petition for admission to become a citizen.

Section 4 of the Naturalization Law of June 29, 1906, provides, among other things, as follows:

'First. He shall declare on oath before the clerk of any court authorized by this act to naturalize aliens, or his authorized deputy, in the district in which such alien resides, two years at least prior to his admission, and after he has reached the age of eighteen years, that it is bona fide his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty and particularly, by name, to the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of which the alien may be at the time a citizen or subject. And such declaration shall set forth the name, age, occupation, personal description, place of birth, last foreign residence and allegiance, the date of arrival, the name of the vessel, if any, in which he came to the United States, and the present place of residence in the United States of said alien: Provided, however, that no alien who, in conformity with the law in force at the date of his declaration, has declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States shall be required to renew such declaration: * * * Provided further, That any person belonging to the class of persons authorized and qualified under existing law to become a citizen of the United States who has resided constantly in the United States during a period of five years next preceding May first, nineteen hundred and ten, who, because of misinformation in regard to his citizenship or the requirements of the law governing the naturalization of citizens has labored and acted under the impression that he was or could become a citizen of the United States and has in good faith exercised the rights or duties of a citizen or intended citizen of the United States because of such wrongful information and belief may, upon making a showing of such facts satisfactory to a court having jurisdiction to issue papers of naturalization to an alien, and the court in its judgment believes that such person has been for a period of more than five years entitled upon proper proceedings to be naturalized as a citizen of the United States, receive from the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • In re Conis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • November 22, 1929
    ...This rule of construction is applicable to naturalization statutes as well as to other statutes (In re Wehrli D. C. 157 F. 938; In re Yunghauss D. C. 210 F. 545; Yunghauss v. U. S. C. C. A. 218 F. 168; United States v. Morena, 245 U. S. 392, 38 S. Ct. 151, 62 L. Ed. 359), despite the fact t......
  • In re Anderson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • June 8, 1914
    ... ... While ... the question at issue is not free from doubt, it is believed ... that the construction placed by the court upon the statute ... will more nearly harmonize its various provisions than that ... given it in the cases of In re Yunghauss (D.C.) 210 ... F. 545, and In re Goldstein (D.C.) 211 F. 163. See, ... also, In re Wehrli (D.C.) 157 F. 938. The foregoing ... conclusion is in accord with the view of the question ... entertained by the Bureau of Naturalization and is in harmony ... with Eichhorst v. Lindsey (D.C.) 209 F ... ...
  • In re Pollock
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 1, 1918
    ... ... law stood prior to the act of May 9, 1918, infra, (a) an ... alien enemy, who had filed his petition subsequent to the ... declaration of war against the country of which he was a ... subject, could not be naturalized during the war, and (b) in ... this circuit after the decision in Yunghauss v. United ... States (D.C.) 210 F. 545, dated January 26, 1914, and ... affirmed 218 F. 168, 134 C.C.A. 67, declarations of intention ... made prior to September 27, 1906, were not available to ... applicants, unless the petition for naturalization was filed ... within seven years after said ... ...
  • Harmon v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • May 26, 1915
    ...section 4 of the Naturalization Act of June 29, 1906 (34 Stat. 596, c. 3592 (Comp. St. 1913, Sec. 4352)). As fully explained in Re Yunghauss (D.C.) 210 F. 545, and in the same case in the Court of Appeals, v. United States, 218 F. 168, 134 C.C.A. 67, the latter decision being on October 8, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT