In The Interest Of L.J.Petition Of L.J.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Citation994 A.2d 1080
Decision Date18 May 2010
PartiesIn the Interest of L.J.Petition of L.J.

994 A.2d 1080

In the Interest of L.J.
Petition of L.J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 18, 2010.



Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 704 EAL 2009.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 987 A.2d 831.

994 A.2d 1081
ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether and when a reviewing court considering a challenge to a pretrial suppression ruling, whether in a post-verdict or appellate context, may look beyond the record of evidence presented at the suppression hearing?

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • In re L.J.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • October 30, 2013
    ...or appellate context, may look beyond the record of evidence presented at the suppression hearing.” In the Interest of: L.J., 606 Pa. 46, 994 A.2d 1080 (2010). The Superior Court relied on a footnote from this Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Chacko, 500 Pa. 571, 459 A.2d 311 (1983), for......
  • In re L. J., J-71-2013
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • October 30, 2013
    ...or appellate context, may look beyond the record of evidence presented at the suppression hearing." In the Interest of: L.J., 994 A.2d 1080 (Pa. 2010). The Superior Court relied on a footnote from this Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Chacko, 459 A.2d 311 (Pa. 1983), for the proposi......
2 cases
  • In re L.J.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • October 30, 2013
    ...or appellate context, may look beyond the record of evidence presented at the suppression hearing.” In the Interest of: L.J., 606 Pa. 46, 994 A.2d 1080 (2010). The Superior Court relied on a footnote from this Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Chacko, 500 Pa. 571, 459 A.2d 311 (1983), for......
  • In re L. J., J-71-2013
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • October 30, 2013
    ...or appellate context, may look beyond the record of evidence presented at the suppression hearing." In the Interest of: L.J., 994 A.2d 1080 (Pa. 2010). The Superior Court relied on a footnote from this Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Chacko, 459 A.2d 311 (Pa. 1983), for the proposition ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT