In the Matter of Susan J. Regan and Steven S. Regan
| Docket Number | 2011-701 |
| Decision Date | 18 July 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
State v. Moore
... ... It is neither final nor exclusive.’ " 2A Singer & Shambie Singer, supra § 47.22, at 401-02 (quoting Helvering v. Stockholms &c. Bank , 293 U.S. 84, 89, 55 S.Ct. 50, 79 L.Ed. 211 (1934) ); see In the Matter of Regan & Regan , 164 N.H. 1, 9, 48 A.3d 920 (2012). The doctrine "is always subject to the qualification that general words will not be used in a restricted sense if the act as a whole demonstrates a different legislative purpose in view of the objectives to be obtained." Regan , 164 N.H. at 9, 48 A.3d ... ...
-
State v. Cain
... ... The crux of the matter is that the rule of ejusdem generis is only a constructionary crutch and not a judicial ukase in the ascertainment of legislative intention. quoting State v. Small , 99 N.H. 349, 351 (1955). See also , In re Regan , 164 N.H. 1, 9 (2012); Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank , 293 U.S. 84, 89, 55 S. Ct. 50, 52 (1934) ( ejusdem generis is "only an aid to the ascertainment of the true meaning of the statute); Sutherland §47:22 ("General words are not restricted in meaning to objects ejusdem generis if ... ...
-
In re Hoyt
... ... at 544, 618 A.2d 286 (quotation omitted).The petitioner argues that our decision in In the Matter of Coderre & Coderre, 148 N.H. 401, 807 A.2d 1245 (2002), superseded in part by statute as recognized in In the Matter of Regan & Regan, 164 N.H. 1, 48 A.3d 920 (2012), controls the outcome of this case. In Coderre, the father was ordered to pay "seventy-eight percent of [the children's] extracurricular activity expenses" in addition to his support obligations under the guidelines. Coderre, 148 N.H. at 402-03, 807 A.2d ... ...
