In the Matter of Nicholas B., CAF 03-02032.

Decision Date03 February 2006
Docket NumberCAF 03-02032.
PartiesIn the Matter of NICHOLAS B., an Infant. MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent; JAMES B., Appellant, et al., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Gail A. Donofrio, J.), entered August 26, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order denied the application of respondent James B. for the return of his child pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum:

Respondent father appeals from an order denying his application for the return of his child pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028. The appeal must be dismissed as moot, however, in view of the fact that Family Court, upon consent of the parties, adjourned the matter in contemplation of dismissal of the underlying amended neglect petition (see generally Matter of Jabarry W., 24 AD3d 218 [2005]; Matter of Melody B., 234 AD2d 1005 [1996], lv dismissed 90 NY2d 888 [1997]; Matter of Terrell H., 197 AD2d 372, 373 [1993]).

Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Green and Hayes, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Green v. Mattingly
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • October 21, 2009
    ...basis for plaintiff to appeal. See, e.g., In re Javier R., 43 A.D.3d 1, 3, 840 N.Y.S.2d 572 (1st Dep't, 2007); In re Nicholas B., 26 A.D.3d 764, 811 N.Y.S.2d 235 (4th Dep't, 2006). The rationale underlying the Rooker-Feldman doctrine is that only the U.S. Supreme Court—and not lower federal......
  • Del. Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Christopher HH. (In re Carmine GG)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • July 3, 2019
    ...1575, 1575–1576, 40 N.Y.S.3d 820 [2016] ; Matter of Nicholas SS., 143 A.D.3d 1208, 1209, 39 N.Y.S.3d 841 [2016] ; Matter of Nicholas B., 26 A.D.3d 764, 764, 811 N.Y.S.2d 235 [2006] ). However, under the circumstances of this case, we find that respondent's appeals, directed at the scope of ......
  • In re Anthony C.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 10, 2012
    ...of disposition dated November 1, 2011 ( see Matter of Jovan W. v. Ticarrah W.P., 92 A.D.3d 888, 889, 939 N.Y.S.2d 863;Matter of Nicholas B., 26 A.D.3d 764, 811 N.Y.S.2d 235;Matter of Jabarry W., 24 A.D.3d 218, 219, 804 N.Y.S.2d 922;see also Matter of Javier R., 43 A.D.3d 1, 840 N.Y.S.2d 572......
  • Niagara Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Lynn H. (In re Angel C.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 8, 2013
    ...888, 661 N.Y.S.2d 832, 684 N.E.2d 282;see *922generally Matter of Kiearah P., 46 A.D.3d 958, 959, 846 N.Y.S.2d 774;Matter of Nicholas B., 26 A.D.3d 764, 764, 811 N.Y.S.2d 235). We note in any event that the appeal is moot for the further reason that the order of disposition expired and the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT