IN THE MATTER OF ECKARD, 415P01.
| Citation | 556 S.E.2d 299,354 N.C. 362 |
| Decision Date | 08 November 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 415P01.,415P01. |
| Parties | In the Matter of Patricia ECKARD, a minor child. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
M. Victoria Jayne, Martha A. Geer, Raleigh, for GAL.
Nathaniel J. Poovey, Newton, for Angela B. Eckard.
ORDER
Guardian at Litem's Petition for Discretionary Review Under N.C.G .S. § 7A-31 is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the North Carolina Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of In the Matter ofDula, 354 N.C. 356, 554 S.E.2d 336 (2001) (No. COAOO-391) and In the Matter of Eva Leonia G. Pope, 354 N.C. 359, 554 S.E.2d 644 (2001).
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
In re J.T.C.
...879-80 ; see also In re Eckard , 144 N.C. App. 187, 197, 547 S.E.2d 835, 841, remanded for reconsideration on other grounds , 354 N.C. 362, 556 S.E.2d 299 (2001). For purposes of appellate review, findings of fact to which no exception is taken are binding. In re H.S.F. , 182 N.C. App. 739,......
-
In re K.S.
...at the hearing." In re Eckard, 144 N.C.App. 187, 197, 547 S.E.2d 835, 841 (citations omitted), remanded on other grounds, 354 N.C. 362, 556 S.E.2d 299 (2001). As this Court has clarified, "[w]here the trial court's findings are supported by competent evidence, they are binding on appeal, ev......
-
In the Matter of L.O., No. COA08-323 (N.C. App. 9/2/2008)
...323, 646 S.E.2d 541, 545 (2007) (quoting In re Eckard, 144 N.C. App. 187, 197, 547 S.E.2d 835, 841, remanded on other grounds, 354 N.C. 362, 556 S.E.2d 299 (2001)). "'[W]here the trial court's findings are supported by competent evidence, they are binding on appeal, even if there is evidenc......
-
In the Matters of A.H., No. COA08-18 (N.C. App. 5/6/2008)
...evidence, they are binding on appeal. In re Eckard, 144 N.C. App. 187, 197, 547 S.E.2d 835, 841, remanded on other grounds, 354 N.C. 362, 556 S.E.2d 299 (2001). Here, sufficient evidence was presented regarding the history of the case and the continual problems between Respondents. First, R......