In the Matter of Wheaton/Tmw Fourth Ave., Lp v. New York City Dept. of Bldgs.

Decision Date08 September 2009
Docket Number2008-06491.
Citation2009 NY Slip Op 06440,65 A.D.3d 1051,886 N.Y.S.2d 41
PartiesIn the Matter of WHEATON/TMW FOURTH AVENUE, LP, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
65 A.D.3d 1051
886 N.Y.S.2d 41
2009 NY Slip Op 06440
In the Matter of WHEATON/TMW FOURTH AVENUE, LP, Respondent,
v.
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS, Appellant.
2008-06491.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Decided September 8, 2009.

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in effect, in the nature of mandamus to compel the New York City Department of Buildings to rescind a stop work order dated December 27, 2007, and, in effect, action for a judgment declaring the stop work order void, the New York City Department of Buildings appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated June 4, 2008, which granted the petitioner's motion, in effect, for a preliminary injunction

[65 A.D.3d 1052]

enjoining the New York City Department of Buildings from enforcing the stop work order during the pendency of the proceeding.


Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and an exercise of discretion, and the motion, in effect, for a preliminary injunction is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellant.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the petitioner's motion, in effect, for a preliminary injunction enjoining the appellant from enforcing a stop work order dated December 27, 2007.

On a motion for a preliminary injunction, the movant must demonstrate (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury absent the granting of the preliminary injunction, and (3) a balancing of the equities in the movant's favor (see Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750 [1988]; Automated Waste Disposal, Inc. v Mid-Hudson Waste, Inc., 50 AD3d 1072, 1072-1073 [2008]; Petervary v Bubnis, 30 AD3d 498 [2006]). "A party seeking the drastic remedy of a preliminary injunction must establish a clear right to that relief under the law and the undisputed facts" (Omakaze Sushi Rest., Inc. v Ngan Kam Lee, 57 AD3d 497 [2008]; see Miller v Price, 267 AD2d 363, 364 [1999]). The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to maintain the status quo, not to determine the ultimate rights of the parties (see Moody v Filipowski, 146 AD2d 675, 678 [1989]; Matter of 35 N.Y. City Police Officers v City of New York, 34 AD3d 392, 393-394...

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • Shake Shack Fulton St. Brooklyn, LLC v. Allied Prop. Grp., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 20, 2019
    ... ... , Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.ArguedSeptember 20, 2019November 20, 2019112 ... its consent to a permit to be issued by the City of New York Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) ... , 1123, 53 N.Y.S.3d 157 ; 177 A.D.3d 927 Matter of Armanida Realty Corp. v. Town of Oyster Bay, ... Y.S.2d 430, quoting Matter of Wheaton/TMW Fourth Ave., LP v. New York City Dept. of Bldgs., 65 ... ...
  • Lazaro v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 23, 2015
    ... ... /2014.Supreme Court, Suffolk County, New York.Feb. 23, 2015.Susan N. Persaud, PLLC, Mineola, r Plaintff.Houser & Allison, APC, New York City, for Defendant.OpinionTHOMAS F. WHELAN, J ... Koch 150 A.D.2d 269, 541 N.Y.S.2d 790 [1st Dept 1989] ; Matter of Caruso v. Ward, 146 A.D.2d 486, ... WL 2228792 [2d Dept 2013] ; Wheaton/TMW Fourth Ave., LP v. New York City Dept. of Bldgs., 65 ... ...
  • Sheriff Officers Assoc., Inc., ex rel. Stasko v. Nassau Cnty.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 12, 2012
    ...2012 NY Slip Op 3161In the Matter of the Application ofSHERIFF OFFICERS ... 4621/12SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK TRIAL TERM. PART 11Date: June 8, ... of the parties' (Matter of Wheaton/TMW Fourth Ave., LP v. New York City Dept. of Bldgs., 65 ... ...
  • Huntington Vill. Dental, PC v. Rathbauer
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 18, 2013
    ... ... 3462012.Supreme Court, Suffolk County, New York.Jan. 18, 2013 ... Garfunkel Wild, PC Great ... Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum, P.C., Garden City, for Defendants.THOMAS F. WHELAN, J.Upon the ... , 862, 552 N.Y.S.2d 918 [1990];Wheaton/TMW Fourth Ave., LP v. New York City Dept. of Bldgs., 65 ... 1072, 857 N.Y.S.2d 648 [2d Dept 2008]; Matter of 35 New York City Police Officers v. City of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT