In the Matter of Marshall R. Crawford, 79S00-9805-DI-284
| Decision Date | 01 September 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 79S00-9805-DI-284,79S00-9805-DI-284 |
| Citation | 734 N.E.2d 563 |
| Parties | (Ind. 2000) In the Matter of Marshall R. CRAWFORD. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Comes now the respondent, Marshall R. Crawford, and tenders to this Court his resignation from the bar of this State, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17.
And This Court, being duly advised, not finds that the tendered resignation satisfies the requirements of Admis.Disc.R. 23(17), and that, accordingly, it should be accepted.
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED that the resignation from the bar of this state tendered by the respondent, Marshall R. Crawford, is hereby accepted. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to strike his name from the Roll of Attorneys. In order to be readmitted, he must comply with the reinstatement provisions contained in Admis.Disc.R. 23(4).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by virtue of the respondent's resignation from the bar of this state, all attorney disciplinary proceedings pending against him are hereby dismissed.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to the respondnet of his attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entitles pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(3)(d).
All Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Flowers v. State
-
Dept. of State Revenue v. FARM CREDIT SVCS.
... ... Chief Justice Marshall's opinion for the Court relied both on the discriminatory nature of the ... of the federal statute governing PCAs, noted it was silent on the matter of taxation, and concluded its inquiry, thus holding against the state ... ...
-
Cook v. State
... ... alcohol consumption with each witness but did not explore the matter. Elmer Abbot testified that he had consumed six to eight beers earlier ... ...
-
Lampitok v. State
... ... not hearsay because it was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted ... On appeal, Lampitok contends that the ... ...
-
Recent Developments in Environmental Law in Indiana
...which will not be disturbed unless the trial court's application of the Daubert framework is manifestly erroneous. Cook v. State, 734 N.E.2d 563, 570 (Ind. 2000); McGrew v. State, 682 N.E.2d 1289, 1292 (Ind. 3. Evidence rules in other states About half the states, including Indiana and Kent......