Indiana Merchants' Protective Association, Incorporated v. Little

Decision Date15 October 1930
Docket Number25,293
Citation172 N.E. 905,202 Ind. 193
PartiesIndiana Merchants' Protective Association, Incorporated, v. Little
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From Marion Superior Court (36,993); Theophilus J. Moll, Judge

Application by Earl E. Little for the appointment of a receiver for the Indiana Merchants' Protective Association, Incorporated. From the order appointing a receiver, the defendant appealed.

Reversed.

Bernard Stroyman, for appellant.

Snethen & Summers, for appellee.

OPINION

Gemmill, J.

On September 15, 1926, appellee filed his complaint against appellant, in the superior court of Marion County. Summons was issued by the clerk and served by the sheriff. The return day was October 4, 1926. On September 18, a verified amended complaint was filed. In the amended complaint, it is alleged that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $ 341; that the defendant is in imminent danger of insolvency; that officers of the defendant company have told the plaintiff they have no money with which to pay his claim and that there are many other creditors who claim that money is due them from the defendant; that the president and manager of the defendant also owns and operates a company known as "the State Detective Agency," which has its offices in the same room with the defendant company, and he has paid bills for the State Detective Agency out of funds belonging to the defendant; that the funds of the defendant have been so used that the defendant is in immediate danger of insolvency, and a receiver should be appointed to conserve the assets of the defendant and to carry on the business of the defendant, which can be run at a profit of approximately $ 300 per month, until all the creditors shall be paid; that the only assets which the defendant has are the monthly payments which it receives from its night patrol and watch service and that considerable money is due the defendant for that service; and that, unless a receiver is appointed for said property immediately, this income will be spent and wasted and the plaintiff will lose his entire security for the indebtedness of said defendant to him, secured only by this income, and that a receiver should be appointed immediately to receive the income and pay the creditors of the defendant. The prayer was that a receiver of the property and effects of the defendant be appointed, with the usual powers and authority conferred upon receivers in such cases.

On the day the amended complaint was filed, a receiver was appointed to take charge of and hold the property and continue the business of the defendant. The receiver filed his bond in the sum of $ 1,000, and same was approved. The defendant filed its exceptions to the appointment of a receiver without notice.

On appeal, appellant assigns errors as follows: (1) The court erred in appointing a receiver in said cause; and (2) the court erred in appointing a receiver without notice in said cause.

"Receivers shall not be appointed, either in term or vacation, in any case, until the adverse party shall have appeared, or shall have had reasonable notice of the application for such appointment, except upon sufficient cause shown by affidavit." Acts 1881 (Spec. Sess.) p. 240, § 253, § 1288 Burns 1914, § 1301 Burns 1926.

The court heard the oral evidence of the plaintiff and another witness. This evidence was not admissible, and will not be considered on appeal. The plaintiff did not file any supporting affidavit or affidavits, and the only competent evidence herein is the verified complaint. Marshall v. Matson (1908), 171 Ind. 238, 86 N.E. 339; General Motors Oil Co. v. Matheny (1916), 185 Ind. 114, 113 N.E. 4; Kent, etc., Grocery Co. v. George Hitz & Co. (1918), 187 Ind. 606, 120 N.E. 659.

Facts showing a sufficient cause to exist for the appointment of a receiver without...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Indiana Merchants' Protective Ass'n, Inc. v. Little
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 15 Octubre 1930
    ... ... Appeal from Superior Court, Marion County; Theo. J. Moll, Judge.Action by Earl E. Little against the Indiana Merchants' Protective Association, Inc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.Reversed, with directions to set aside the appointment of the receiver.[172 N.E. 906]Bernard ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT