Indus. Trust Co. v. Flynn
Decision Date | 09 August 1948 |
Docket Number | No. 1850.,1850. |
Citation | 60 A.2d 851 |
Parties | INDUSTRIAL TRUST CO. v. FLYNN et al. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Certified from Superior Court, Providence and Bristol Counties; Robert E. Quinn, Judge.
Bill in equity by the Industrial Trust Company, trustee under the will of Samuel Pomeroy Colt, deceased, against Theodora DeWolf Flynn and others for construction of certain portions of will of Samuel Pomeroy Colt, deceased, and for instructions relative to trusts therein established. The bill was certified to the Supreme Court.
Decree in accordance with opinion.
Edwards & Angell, of Providence (Walter A. Edwards and Frederick Lippitt, both of Providence, of counsel), for complainant.
Hinckley, Allen, Tillinghast & Wheeler, Stuart H. Tucker, and Bruce M. Docherty, all of Providence, for respondent Russell G. Colt.
Greenough, Lyman & Cross, William B. Greenough, and R. Gordon Scott, Jr., all of Providence, for respondent Mary L. Gross.
Edward W. Day, of Providence (Gardner, Day & Sawyer, of Providence, of counsel), for respondent Melba P. Colt individually and as administratrix.
Charles R. Haslam, of Providence (Stephen F. Mullen, of Providence, of counsel), guardian ad litem of respondents Caldwell, Byron, and Melba Colt.
Edward L. Leahy, of Providence, for respondent Elizabeth Colt Wilson.
George Hurley and John W. Moakler, Jr., both of Providence, for respondents Edwin A. Barrows, Jr., Elizabeth L. Anthony, S. Reed Anthony, and LeBaron Colt Anthony.
Swan, Keeney & Smith, of Providence (Frank H. Swan, Jr., of Providence, of counsel), for respondent Thomas W. McCue.
Horace L. Weller, of Providence, for respondent William G. Nightingale, Jr., and guardian ad litem of respondents Barbara DeWolf Nightingale and William Greene Nightingale, 3rd, Silas Reed Anthony, Jr., Magdelaine Richmond Anthony, Bryan Anthony, and Robert Weeks Anthony.
Sayles Gorham, of Providence, guardian ad litem of respondents John Drew Miglietta, Samuel Colt Wilson, Dorothy Wilson, and Rodney Chipman Wilson.
Fred B. Perkins, of Providence (Perkins, Higgins & McCabe, Fred B. Perkins, and Eugene V. Higgins, all of Providence, of counsel), guardian ad litem of respondent Theodora DeWolf Flynn, and representative of contingent interests.
James O. McManus and Joseph W. Grimes, both of Providence, for respondent Joseph W. Grimes.
This is a bill in equity brought by the trustee under the will of Samuel Pomeroy Colt, late of Bristol, Rhode Island, for the construction of certain portions of the twenty-seventh and twenty-eighth clauses thereof and for instructions relative to the trusts therein established. All persons having possible interests in the income or principal of these trusts were made respondents, all minors were represented by the guardians of their estates or by a duly appointed guardian ad litem, and a representative of contingent interests of persons not in being or not ascertainable was also appointed by the court. A decree pro confesso was entered against each respondent who failed to appear and file an answer, and the cause, being ready for hearing for final decree, was then certified to this court for determination under General Laws 1938, chapter 545, § 7.
The following material facts are not disputed. Samuel Pomeroy Colt, the testator, executed his will on December 28, 1917 and died on August 13, 1921. The will was duly probated. He was survived by two sons, Russell G. Colt and Roswell C. Colt, and a brother, LeBaron B. Colt, and they constitute the first life tenants of the residuary trust involved in the twenty-eighth clause.
Each of these first life tenants had a child or children living at the testator's death. Russell G. Colt, a son, had three such children, namely Samuel Colt, Ethel B. Miglietta, and John Drew Colt. Roswell C. Colt, the other son, had one such child, namely Elizabeth Colt Smith. Subsequently he married Melba P. Colt and had three other children, namely, Caldwell Colt, Byron Colt, and Melba Colt, all of whom were born after the testator's decease. LeBaron B. Colt, the testator's brother, died on August 18, 1924, and he was survived by three such children, Theodora L. Barrows, Mary L. Gross, and Elizabeth L. Anthony, all of whom were married.
The questions here involved arise because of the death on July 28, 1946, of said Theodora L. Barrows, one of the three daughters who survived LeBaron, and therefore one of the three second life tenants of his share. She was survived by a son, Edwin A. Barrows, Jr., and by Theodora DeWolf Flynn (only child of Theodora Barrows McCue, deceased daughter of Mrs. Barrows), and by Barbara DeWolf Nightingale and William Greene Nightingale, III (only children of Barbara Barrows Nightingale, the other deceased daughter of Mrs. Barrows). All Mrs. Barrows' children were born during the testator's lifetime, and her two daughters died intestate after LeBaron's decease and during their mother's lifetime. None of Mrs. Barrows' grandchildren were born during the testator's lifetime.
The bill of complaint seeks instructions primarily as to the disposition of Mrs. Barrows' share of the surplus income from the trust in clause Twenty-seventh and her share of income and a proportionate share of the principal under the residuary trust in clause Twenty-eighth of the will.
Clause Twenty-seventh of the will established a special trust for the maintenance of the homestead and farm in Bristol ‘for and during the natural lives of said children and grandchildren until all but one of them shall have deceased,’ at which time said real estate will be conveyed to such last survivor. Certain other realty and one-half of the residue of his estate is also placed in trust to provide income, if necessary for such maintenance; and then comes the provision here involved, viz.,
Clause Twenty-eighth of the will reads as follows:
(Italics ours)
The questions propounded for our consideration are as follows: ‘(1) What...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Probate Court of the City of Warwick v. Bank of America, N.A.
...of textual interpretation—that the purpose of interpreting a will is to ascertain the testator's intent, Industrial Trust Co. v. Flynn, 74 R.I. 396, 60 A.2d 851, 857 (1948), that the words of a will are to be given their ordinary meanings, Bliven v. Borden, 56 R.I. 283, 185 A. 239, 242 (193......
-
Fleet Nat. Bank v. Miglietta
...into and become part of the 28th-clause residuary trust and be distributed according to the rule established in Industrial Trust Co. v. Flynn, 74 R.I. 396, 60 A.2d 851 (1948). The result of this argument would be to divide the principal of the 27th-clause special trust into three parts that......
-
Industrial Nat. Bank of Providence v. Colt
...rather than to reward the longest-lived at the expense of the others. In that clause he provided what in Industrial Trust Co. v. Flynn, 74 R.I. 396, 410, 60 A.2d 851, 858, we said was a clear "formula"; viz., "*** the income from a one-third share to each of his sons and brother for life, a......
-
National City Bank of New York v. Beebe
...from language employed in the will. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. Otis, 77 R.I. 296, 299, 75 A.2d 210; Industrial Trust Co. v. Flynn, 74 R.I. 396, 408, 60 A.2d 851; Bliven v. Borden, 56 R.I. 283, 288, 185 A. By the language of the 'Second' clause of the will of Abbie Norman Prince, it ......