Industrial Com'n of Colorado v. Hunter
| Decision Date | 02 April 1923 |
| Docket Number | 10574. |
| Citation | Industrial Com'n of Colorado v. Hunter, 214 P. 393, 73 Colo. 226 (Colo. 1923) |
| Parties | INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF COLORADO et al. v. HUNTER. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to District Court, Pueblo County; James A. Park, Judge.
Proceeding by Edna May Hunter, widow of William T. Hunter, deceased, in behalf of herself and Louis E. Hunter, and other minor children of William T. Hunter, deceased, under the Workmen's Compensation Act, for compensation for death of William T. Hunter, opposed by the State of Colorado emplóyer, and the State Compensation Fund, insurer.Judgment for claimants, on appeal from the Industrial Commission of Colorado, and the Industrial Commission and the employer and insurer bring error.
Affirmed.
Findings of fact in a workman's compensation proceeding, having competent testimony to support them, are conclusive on review.
Russell W. Fleming, Atty. Gen., and Joseph P O'Connell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiffs in error.
Hughes Langdon & Barbrick, of Pueblo, for defendant in error.
The defendants in error were claimants under the Workmen's Compensation Act(Laws 1919, p. 700), as dependents upon William Hunter, deceased who was, at the time of his death, a water commissioner residing at Rye, Colo.He was killed while riding in an automobile from his home to Pueblo, in company with one Parks.The circumstances of the killing are recited in Industrial Commission v. Pueblo Co., 71 Colo. 425, 207 P. 479.The Commission found that the killing did not arise out of his employment, though he was at the time acting in the course of his employment.The district court of Pueblo county held that, under the findings of fact made by the Commission, Hunter's death was the result of an accident arising out of his employment, and directed an award accordingly.That judgment is now before us for review.
The Commission found that:
Hunter was driving the car.
We must accept the findings of the Commission and they show that Hunter was killed while in the line of his employment.The only remaining question is, Did the killing arise out of said employment?In the case of Industrial Commission v. AEtna Life Co., 64 Colo. 480, 174 P. 589, 3 A.L.R. 1336, one Lynch was killed in an automobile accident while going from one place of work to another place to work, by the direction of his employer.We there held that his death arose out of his employment.
The Commission found that Hunter was traveling on the public road for the purpose of doing work required by his employment as water commissioner.It would seem that the case just quoted is authority for the judgment of the district court.In this case, as in that, the deceased was traveling on a public road in the discharge of his duties as an employee.It is not possible to lay down any rule of universal application.Each case must stand, to a considerable degree, upon its facts.There are certain well-established principles, however, which may be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Beem v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.
... ... Southern Surety Co., 26 S.W.2d ... 691; Sullivan v. Industrial Comm., 10 P.2d 924; ... Covey-Ballard Motor Co. v. Industrial Comm., ... 420, 134 N.E ... 330; Industrial Comm. v. Hunter, 73 Colo. 226, 214 ... P. 393; Rasmuth v. Amer. Radiator Co., 201 A.D ... ...
-
Wahlig v. Krenning-Schlapp Grocer Co.
... ... 3, ... p. 492; London & Lancashire Co. v. Industrial Accident ... Commission, 35 Cal.App. 681; Industrial Commission ... v ... Colo. 424, 207 P. 479; Industrial Commission v ... Hunter, 73 Colo. 226, 214 P. 393; New Amsterdam ... Casualty Co. v. Sumrell, ... ...
-
City of Brighton & Cirsa v. Rodriguez
...was implicated when: (1) an employee was killed by car thieves on the way back from an employment errand, Indus. Comm'n of Colo. v. Hunter, 73 Colo. 226, 227–30, 214 P. 393, 394 (1923); 4 (2) a farm hand was killed by a lightning strike while tending to his employer's horses, Aetna Life Ins......
-
Buckner v. Quick Seal
... ... to all on the street.' [See, also, the following cases: ... Industrial Commission v. Hunter, 73 Colo. 226, 214 ... P. 393; Rosmuth v. American ... ...