Ingersoll v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of Town of Salisbury

Decision Date21 August 1984
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesUrsula INGERSOLL v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF SALISBURY et al.

J. Keith Nolan, Lakeville, for petitioner (plaintiff).

William O. Riiska, Hartford, for respondents (defendants Francis Gomez et al.).

Before SPEZIALE, C.J., and PETERS, HEALEY, PARSKEY, SHEA and GRILLO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court from a decision of the Salisbury planning and zoning commission. Her appeal was dismissed. She then petitioned the Appellate Court for certification for review. The Appellate Court denied her petition, and she now petitions this court for certification, alleging that she is aggrieved by the decision of the Superior Court and by the decision of the Appellate Court denying her petition.

Appeals from zoning commissions and planning commissions may be taken to the Superior Court, and, upon certification only, to the Appellate Court. See, e.g., General Statutes § 8-28, as amended by Public Acts, Spec.Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 59. The Supreme Court's authority to grant petitions for certification from the Appellate Court is found in General Statutes § 51-197f, as amended by Public Acts, Spec.Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 7. That statute provides, in pertinent part, that "[u]pon final determination of any appeal by the appellate court, there shall be no right to further review except ... [t]he supreme court shall have the power to certify cases for its review upon petition by an aggrieved party ...." (Emphasis added.) See also Practice Book § 3135. 1 The issue before us here is whether § 51-197f permits us to consider a petition for certification following the denial of certification by the Appellate Court in a zoning or planning matter.

Because, under § 8-28, as amended, the plaintiff could not appeal to the Appellate Court in the absence of that Court's certification; see also Practice Book §§ 2000, 3154 (matter deemed "pending on appeal" and entered upon the docket after granting of certification); we hold that the decision of the Appellate Court denying the plaintiff's petition for certification was not a "final determination of [an] appeal by the appellate court" within the meaning of § 51-197f. We have no jurisdiction to consider the plaintiff's petition, and it is therefore dismissed sua sponte.

1 "[Practice Book] Sec. 3135. RIGHT OF APPEAL

"Appeals may be taken to the supreme court in causes determined in the appellate court where the supreme court, upon petition of an aggrieved party...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Ayala
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • June 9, 1992
    ...for certification from decisions of the Appellate Court denying leave to appeal in a zoning matter; Ingersoll v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 194 Conn. 277, 278-79, 479 A.2d 1207 (1984); and denying relief on a motion for review. State v. Carter, 212 Conn. 811, 564 A.2d 1072 (1989). We hav......
  • State v. Daniel B.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • March 5, 2019
    ... ... " to effectuate her murder, and planning the manner of the killing, including his own ... See, e.g., 331 Conn. 13 Kasica v. Town of Columbia , 309 Conn. 85, 93, 70 A.3d 1 (2013) ... ...
  • State v. Daniel B.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 2016
  • State v. Daniel B.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 2016
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT