Ingraham v. People of State
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | SHELDON |
| Citation | Ingraham v. People of State , 94 Ill. 428, 1880 WL 9965 (Ill. 1880) |
| Decision Date | 31 January 1880 |
| Parties | WILLIAM R. INGRAHAMv.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Adams county; the Hon. JOSEPH SIBLEY, Judge, presiding.
Mr. A. E. WHEAT, and Mr. GEORGE SIMMONS, for the appellant.
Mr. JAMES K. EDSALL, Attorney General, for the People.
This appeal must be dismissed, as not rightfully taken.
The act amendatory of the Practice act, approved June 3, 1879, (Laws 1879, p. 222,) amends the 88th section of the Practice act as follows: “Appeals from and writs of error to circuit courts, the Superior Court of Cook county, the Criminal Court of Cook county, county courts and city courts, in all criminal cases below the grade of felony, shall be taken directly to the Appellate Court,” etc. This case, being one of a misdemeanor, comes within this provision. It is true that the appeal was allowed by the circuit court on the 4th day of March, 1879, and an appeal bond was filed on the following 6th day of March, and the act did not go into effect until July 1, 1879; and had the case been one in which an appeal lay to this court at the time this one was allowed, or had the transcript of the record been filed in this court before July 1, 1879, we might, perhaps, have entertained jurisdiction.
But the record was not filed in this court until December 31, 1879.
At the time this appeal was allowed by the circuit court, an appeal did not lie to this court in a criminal case. Although the 8th section of the Appellate Court act and the 88th section of the Practice act of 1877 provided that appeals from and writs of error to circuit courts, and the Superior Court of Cook county and city courts, might be taken directly to the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Snow v. Snow
... ... does not lie from the order adjudging defendant guilty of ... contempt. People v. Owens, 8 Utah 20; Clark v ... People, 12 Am. Dec. 184, notes; In re ... Whittemore, 35 P ... before the contempt proceedings were instituted. State v ... Second District, 40 P. 66; O'Callaghan v ... O'Callaghan, 69 Ill. 532 ... The ... Mass. 230; New Orleans v. Steamship Co., 87 ... U.S. 387, 20 Wall. 387, 22 L.Ed. 354; Ingraham v ... People, 94 Ill. 428. Cases of that character are ... clearly distinguishable from ... ...
-
H.&A. Israelstam v. United States Cas. Co.
...are included in the class of cases to be taken from the inferior court direct to the Supreme Court upon appeal or writ of error. Ingraham v. People, 94 Ill. 428, was an appeal direct to the Supreme Court in criminal case, and it was there held that previous to the passage of the Appellate C......