Ingram v. State
Decision Date | 09 February 1996 |
Docket Number | No. CR-94-1032.,CR-94-1032. |
Citation | 729 So.2d 883 |
Parties | Gerald Homer INGRAM, Jr. v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
William H. Broome, Anniston, for appellant.
Jeff Sessions and Bill Pryor, attys. gen., and Robin Blevins, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
Alabama Supreme Court 1972090.
The appellant, Gerald Homer Ingram, Jr., was convicted of murder made capital for an intentional killing during the course of a robbery, see § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Code of Alabama 1975. The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion made pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Specifically, the appellant maintains that in determining that the defense failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, the trial court relied solely on a comparison of the percentage of black persons on the jury with the percentage of black persons on the venire from which the jury was struck, a practice now expressly disapproved by the Alabama Supreme Court in Ex parte Thomas, 659 So.2d 3 (Ala.1994).
The record reflects that after the jury was struck, the following transpired:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carroll v. State
...a jury question not subject to review on appeal, provided the state's evidence established a prima facie case." Ingram v. State, 729 So.2d 883, 895 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). As we stated in Farrior, supra: "Conflicting evidence of intent presents a question for the jury to resolve. Bartlett v. Sta......
-
Cochran v. State
...grounds for the objection should be stated, and a ruling on the objection must be made by the trial court. See Ingram v. State, 729 So. 2d 883 (Ala. Crim. App. 1996). 'When a timely objection at the time of the admission of the evidence is not made, the issue is not preserved for this Court......
-
Cochran v. State
...specific grounds for the objection should be stated, and a ruling on the objection must be made by the trial court. See Ingram v. State, 729 So.2d 883 (Ala.Crim.App.1996). ‘When a timely objection at the time of the admission of the evidence is not made, the issue is not preserved for this ......
-
McElyea v. State
...(1989), quoting, in turn, Connolly v. State, 500 So.2d 57, 63 (Ala.Cr.App.1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 68 (Ala.1986)." Ingram v. State, 729 So.2d 883, 895-96 (Ala.Crim.App.1996) (opinion on return to In this case, the only event that separated the murder from the robbery occurred when the perpet......