Ingram v. United States, 19199.

Decision Date19 February 1962
Docket NumberNo. 19199.,19199.
Citation299 F.2d 351
PartiesHorace INGRAM, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Horace E. Ingram, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

J. Robert Sparks, Asst. U. S. Atty., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

IT APPEARING that the grounds asserted by the appellant for reversing the trial court's dismissal of the Section 2255 motion were all apparent at the time the original appeal from conviction was taken, and they are not such as may be attacked under Section 2255, the judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • United States v. Grasso
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • March 22, 1979
    ...Medrano v. United States, 315 F.2d 361 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 375 U.S. 854, 84 S.Ct. 114, 11 L.Ed.2d 81 (1963); Ingram v. United States, 299 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1962). Grasso's collateral claim that the absence of a written waiver or colloquy on the record denied him his Sixth Amendment ri......
  • Smith v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • December 15, 1967
    ...denied, 379 U.S. 980, 85 S.Ct. 685, 13 L.Ed.2d 571 (1965); Medrano v. United States, 315 F.2d 361 (9th Cir. 1963); Ingram v. United States, 299 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1962); McFarlane v. United States, 231 F.Supp. 191 (S.D.N.Y.1964). Many courts have alluded to the abuse of post-conviction reme......
  • Randall v. United States, 71-2528 Summary Calendar.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 29, 1972
    ...3 The denial of the pre-trial continuance was considered by this court on direct appeal and need not be reconsidered. Ingram v. United States, 299 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1962); Griffin v. United States, 352 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 4 TAMARGO: Motion to suppress statement of the defendant, Your Honor.......
  • Delegal v. United States, 23213.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • July 8, 1966
    ...416; Boruff v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 310 F.2d 918; Van De Bogart v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 305 F.2d 583; Ingram v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 299 F.2d 351; Enzor v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 296 F.2d 62, cert. denied, 1962, 369 U.S. 854, 82 S.Ct. 940, 8 L.Ed.2d 12; Larson ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT