Inhabitants of the Township of Bernards v. Morrison
Citation | 133 U.S. 523,10 S.Ct. 333,33 L.Ed. 766 |
Parties | INHABITANTS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS v. MORRISON et al |
Decision Date | 03 March 1890 |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
A. A. Clark, and Jas. R. English, for plaintiff in error.
Cortlandt Parker, for defendants in error.
This is an action on township bonds. Judgment was rendered against the township, and it alleges error. The bonds were issued under an act approved April 9, 1868, and found in the Session Laws of New Jersey for that year, (page 915 et seq.) Outside of the obligatory words, this was the form of the bond:
'This bond is one of a series of like tenor, amounting in the whole to the sum of one hundred and twenty-seven thousand dollars, issued on the faith and credit of said township in pursuance of an act entitled 'An act to authorize certain towns in the counties of Somerset, Morris, Essex, and Union to issue bonds and take stock in the Passaic Valley and Peapack Railroad Company,' approved April 9, 1868. In testimony whereof the undersigned, commissioners of the said township of Bernards, in the county of Somerset, to carry into effect the purposes and provisions of the said act, duly appointed, commissioned, and sworn, have hereunto set our hands and seals the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-nine.
'JOHN GUERIN, [L. S.]
'OLIVER R. STEELE, [L. S.]
'Commissioners.
'Registered in the county clerk's office.
'WILLIAM ROSS, Jr., County Clerk.'
The first section of the act provides that, upon the application in writing of 12 or more resident freeholders, the circuit court of the county shall appoint three resident freeholders to be commissioners. Section 2 reads as follows: By section 3 these commissioners were authorized to dispose of the bonds, and invest the money in railroad stock in the name of the township, to subscribe for and purchase stock in the railroad company, and to act at stockholders' meetings. Section 14 provides 'that all bonds issued in accordance with the provisions of this act shall be registered in the office of the county clerk of the county in which the township is situated issuing the same, and the words 'Registered in the county clerk's office' shall be printed or written across the face of each bond, attested by the signature of the county clerk when so registered, and no bond shall be valid unless so registered.'
It is conceded that the commissioners were duly appointed; that the issue of bonds was not in excess of the amount authorized by the statute;...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.
...for to do so 'would go far towards destroying the market value of municipal securities,' Inhabitants of Bernards Township v. Morrison, 133 U.S. 523, 529, 10 S.Ct. 333, 335, 33 L.Ed. 726, 730 (1890). As holders in due course the Chemical Bank, B. J. Van Ingen & Co., and the other members of ......
-
St. Paul Gaslight Company v. Village of Sandstone
... ... issued directly to the water company for the waterworks ... Bernards Tp. v. Stebbins, 109 U.S. 341; Scipio ... v. Wright, 101 U.S. 665; ... City of ... Jeffersonville, 24 How. 287; Bernards Tp. v ... Morrison, 133 U.S. 523; National L. Ins. Co. v ... Board of Education, 10 ... Mutual v. Elizabeth, 42 N.J.L. 235; Cotton v ... Inhabitants, 47 N.J.L. 401 ... That ... Laws 1885, c. 145, ... ...
-
City of Shidler v. HC Speer & Sons Co.
...102 U. S. 278 26 L. Ed. 138; Northern Bank v. Porter Township, 110 U. S. 608, 4 S. Ct. 254 28 L. Ed. 258; Bernards Township v. Morrison, 133 U. S. 523, 10 S. Ct. 333 33 L. Ed. 726; Citizens' Saving & Loan Ass'n v. Perry County, 156 U. S. 692, 15 S. Ct. 547 39 L. Ed. 585; Andes v. Ely, 158 U......
-
Flagg v. Sch. Dist. No. 70, Barnes Cnty.
...statute.” And in that connection we added in that case (quoting with approval) the language of Mr. Justice Brewer in Inhabitants v. Morrison, 133 U. S. 523, 10 Sup. Ct. 333: “It is enough that full control in the matter is given to the officers named.” We stand by this statement of the rule......