Inland Coasting Co v. Tolson
Decision Date | 06 January 1890 |
Citation | 10 S.Ct. 1063,34 L.Ed. 539,136 U.S. 572 |
Parties | INLAND & S. COASTING CO. v. TOLSON |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Statement of Case from pages 572-578 intentionally omitted] Nathaniel Wilson, for plaintiff in error.
Arthur A. Birney and Charles C. Cole, for defendant in error.
The motion to rescind the judgment of dismissal, entered November 4, 1889, to restore the cause to the docket, and to amend the writ of error herein by inserting therein, as plaintiffs in error, the names of Henry A. Willard, John W. Thompson, Samuel Norment, and J. H. Baxter is granted, and case returned to the docket.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. Barnett
...above in this paragraph. It is urged that appellant's motion to amend may be granted on the authority of Inland & Coasting Co. v. Tolson, 136 U. S. 572, 10 S. Ct. 1063, 34 L. Ed. 539; The Mary B. Curtis, 250 F. 9 (C. C. A. 9); The Seguranca, 250 F. 19 (C. C. A. 5). In the Tolson Case the mi......
-
Fitzpatrick v. Int'l Ry. Co.
...contributory negligence upon the defendant. Such is the rule in the federal courts. Inland & Sea-Board Coasting Co. v. Tolson, 139 U. S. 551, at page 557,10 S. Ct. 1063, 34 L. Ed. 539. But whether the plaintiff has the burden in the first instance of proving freedom from contributory neglig......
-
The Mary B. Curtis
...application to be allowed to join in the prosecution of the appeals. We think this case comes within the facts of the cases of Inland Company v. Tolson, and Gilbert v. Hopkins, 198 F. 849, 117 C.C.A. 491, in Fourth Circuit, and Rininger v. Puget Sound Electric Company, 220 F. 419, 136 C.C.A......
-
National Sur. Co. v. Leflore County, Miss.
... ... or appeal may be amended by the insertion of the omitted ... parties. Inland Co. v. Tolson, 136 U.S. 572, 10 ... Sup.Ct. 1063, 34 L.Ed. 539; The Mary B. Curtis, 250 F. 9, 162 ... ...