Inquiry Concerning Honorable Ruth Neely

Docket NumberJ-16-0001
Decision Date07 March 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • In re Day
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • March 15, 2018
    ...rights of same-sex couples. Many of those same issues are currently being litigated in state and federal courts. See, e.g. , In re Neely , 390 P.3d 728 (Wy 2017), cert. den. , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 639, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2018) (imposing censure on judge who publicly refused to perform sa......
  • Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Manlove
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • April 4, 2023
    ...241, 246 (Ind. 2012) ; see generally Hinckley , 2022 WY 18, ¶¶ 6–99, 503 P.3d at 594–620 ; In re Neely , 2017 WY 25, ¶¶ 38–53, 390 P.3d 728, 741–46 (Wyo. 2017) (finding the provisions of the Wyoming Constitution permit the Court to discipline a municipal court judge for violating the Wyomin......
  • In re Kwan
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • May 22, 2019
    ...606–11 (2007) ; In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against O’Toole , 141 Ohio St.3d 355, 24 N.E.3d 1114, 1120–28 (2014) ; In re Neely , 390 P.3d 728, 735–47 (Wyo. 2017).5 During the hearing, Judge Hagen referenced the September 26, 2016 posting and asked, "How is that not a comment on a part......
  • Asm v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • October 12, 2021
    ...exercise thereof[.]" U.S. Const. amend. I. This provision has been applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Neely, ¶ 16, 390 P.3d at 735 Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303, 60 S.Ct. 900, 903, 84 L.Ed. 1213 (1940)). "The free exercise of religion means, first and forem......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Is Your Arbitration Agreement Enforceable?
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • April 7, 2017
    ...L. Fann Contracting, Inc., 179 Ariz. 185, 189 (App. 1994). [2] Duenas v. Life Care Ctrs. Of Am., Inc., 236 Ariz. 130 (2014). [3] 390 P.3d 738 (App. 2017). [4] Id. at ¶ 7 (quoting Maxwell v. Fid. Fin. Servs., Inc., 184 Ariz. 82, 89 [5] Id. at ¶ 26 (internal citation omitted). [6] No. SC15-67......
  • Religious Institutions Update: June 2017
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 1, 2017
    ...the underlying disciplinary process that led to his expulsion. Judge Censured for Not Performing Same-Sex Marriages In In re Neely, 390 P. 3d 728 (Wyo. Mar. 7, 2017), the Supreme Court of Wyoming ruled that disciplining a judge who stated she would not be able to perform same-sex marriages ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Office of Bar Counsel
    • United States
    • Wyoming State Bar Wyoming Lawyer No. 46-3, June 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...959 N.E.2d 241, 246 (Ind. 2012); see generally Hinckley, 2022 WY 18, ¶¶ 6-99, 503 P.3d at 594-620; In re Neely, 2017 WY 25, ¶¶ 38-53, 390 P.3d 728, 741-46 (Wyo. 2017) (finding the provisions of the Wyoming Constitution permit the Court to discipline a municipal court judge for violating the......