Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations

Decision Date04 May 1978
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 7-71654.
Citation451 F. Supp. 1230
PartiesINSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FORTY-EIGHT INSULATIONS, INC., Affiliated FM Insurance Company, Illinois National Insurance Company, Travelers Indemnity of Rhode Island and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

G. Cameron Buchanan, Buchanan, Ogne & Jinks, P. C., Troy, Mich., Michael R. Gallagher, Thomas E. Betz, Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton, Norman & Mollison, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

W. Robert Chandler, Cross, Wrock, Miller & Vieson, Detroit, Mich., William C. Murphy, Richard L. Horwitz, Reid, Ochsenschlager, Murphy & Hupp, Aurora, Ill., for defendant Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.

Ralph W. Barbier, Jr., Barbier, Goulet, Petersmarck & McFarland, St. Clair Shores, Mich., for defendant Affiliated FM Ins. Co.

David M. Tyler, Tyler, Canham, Goulding, Morad & Warner, P. C., Detroit, Mich., for Illinois National Ins. Co.

Richard J. Tonkin, Vandeveer, Garzia, Tonkin, Kerr & Heaphy, P. C., Detroit, Mich., for Travelers Indemnity of Rhode Island.

Jack H. Erps, Birmingham, Mich., for Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.

OPINION

FEIKENS, District Judge.

A declaratory judgment is sought by the Insurance Company of North America (INA) against its former insured, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc. (Forty-Eight), and four (4) other insurance carriers who at some time insured Forty-Eight. These four companies are Affiliated FM Insurance Company (Affiliated FM), Illinois National Insurance Company (Illinois National), The Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island (Travelers), and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual).

This court has jurisdiction of this case by reason of diversity of citizenship of the parties and venue is proper in this district.

The dispute raises questions as to which insurance carrier has a duty to defend and/or to indemnify Forty-Eight for any resultant judgments against it in numerous pending underlying lawsuits. An ancillary issue is whether or not Forty-Eight must share in the payment of a judgment or in the costs of defense. The plaintiffs in each of those lawsuits, either for themselves or as representatives of decedents, claim to have suffered injury or death from asbestos-caused lung diseases as a result of being exposed to Forty-Eight's products containing asbestos. As of the date of this opinion 251 underlying lawsuits have been filed throughout the United States naming Forty-Eight as a defendant. All these suits also name additional defendants—in some cases as many as twenty (20).

In a typical underlying lawsuit a plaintiff construction worker, employed for many years installing products containing asbestos, sues all of the manufacturers whose asbestos products were used at any of the construction sites at which he was employed. The amount of asbestos dust from each manufacturer's product to which such worker was allegedly exposed or what amount he inhaled during any period of exposure cannot be determined with certainty. The exposures allegedly range in duration from a few years to as long as 48 years.

Under the law of some jurisdictions in which these underlying suits are filed all of the manufacturers may be held jointly and severally liable for an entire damage award. See, Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products, 493 F.2d 1076 (5th Cir. 1973); Prosser, Law of Torts, § 52 at 315-320 (4th Ed. 1971). In other jurisdictions the defendant manufacturers may have the burden of showing the proper apportionment of damages. Id. In all cases there is the potentiality that any or all of the defendant manufacturers may be held liable for damages.

The dispute between the parties in this case results from their disagreements over the interpretation of the various insurance policies issued to Forty-Eight and concern their respective rights and obligations regarding coverage and the duty to defend. During the past 50 years Forty-Eight has had at least five (5) liability insurance carriers.1 The controversy as to coverage is whether the coverage at the time of exposure to asbestos or the coverage at the time the disease manifests itself is the relevant coverage. Plaintiff INA and three of the defendant insurance carriers argue for the application of a "manifestation theory" while Forty-Eight and Travelers advocate an "exposure theory."2

I.

The parties have stipulated to most of the facts. In 1934 Forty-Eight, as a subsidiary of an Illinois corporation incorporated in 1923, began selling products containing asbestos. From 1923 through 1970 Forty-Eight or its predecessor manufactured and sold various types of insulation blocks and cements containing asbestos for use on boilers, pipes, fittings, elbows, and flat surfaces. In 1970 it discontinued the use of asbestos in all its products. This fact does not necessarily end the possibility of its asbestos product liability, however, in that demolition or removal of structures containing old insulating materials may cause asbestos to become airborne and may cause injury to persons employed in such activity. Given the latent periods of asbestos-caused lung disease, it is also anticipated that additional actions will be brought against Forty-Eight alleging injury from past exposure.

A. INSURANCE COVERAGE

INA insured Forty-Eight in various policies from October 31, 1955 through October 31, 1972; Affiliated FM from October 31, 1972 through January 10, 1975; Illinois National from January 10, 1975 through January 12, 1976; and Travelers from January 12, 1976 through November 8, 1976. Liberty Mutual became an insurer of Forty-Eight on November 8, 1976 on a $100,000.00 deductible policy currently in force. The following chart shows the dates and coverage limits of the individual policies.

                                                                                     More Than
                                                                      One Person     One Person
                     Policy Name and Number          From     To       One Accident   One Accident  Aggregate
                  Ins. Co. of North America
                        9LB21567                  10/31/55  10/31/58     100,000         300,000     300,000
                        9LB24403                  10/31/58  10/31/61     100,000         300,000     300,000
                        LB24688                   10/31/61   6/17/62     100,000         300,000     300,000
                        LB24688 (End)              6/18/62  10/31/64     500,000         500,000     500,000
                        LB24913                   10/31/64  10/31/67     500,000         500,000     500,000
                        ALB25120                  10/31/67  10/31/72     500,000         500,000     500,000
                  Affiliated FM Insurance Co
                        GLA71255                  10/31/72   1/22/73     500,000         500,000     500,000
                        GLA71342                   1/22/73  12/31/73     500,000         500,000     500,000
                        GLA71886                  12/31/73   1/10/75     400,000         400,000     400,000
                  Illinois National Insurance Co
                        GLA953273                  1/10/75   1/12/76     300,000         300,000     300,000
                  The Travelers Indemnity Co. of Rhode Island
                        650-862A376-4-TRI-76       1/12/76   11/8/76     500,000         500,000     500,000
                  Liberty Mutual Insurance Co
                        LGI-632-004010-126        11/08/76   1/01/78   1,000,000       1,000,000   1,000,000
                

The relevant policy provisions are those that define what is covered, when the coverage applies, and the definitions of the various terms used. These provisions are summarized as follows:

                                                                                                            RELATION
                                   POLICY              INSURING                       POLICY                TO OTHER
                INSURER            PERIOD              AGREEMENT                 PERIOD/TERRITORY           INSURANCE               DEFINITIONS
                INA           10/31/55-10/31/58    To pay on behalf             This policy applies       Excess over other       Bodily injury 
                                                   of insured . . . for         only to such injuries     valid and collectible   shall be construed
                                                   damages because              and damages               insurance               to include sickness
                                                   of bodily injury             occurring                                         disease . . 
                                                   . . . caused by              during the policy
                                                   accident                     period . . 
                INA           10/31/58-10/31/61    Same                         Same                      Same                    Same
                INA           10/31/61- 6/18/62    Same                                                   Same                    Same
                INA           6/18/62-10/31/64     To pay on behalf             Same                      Same                    Bodily injury . . . shall
                              (endorsement)        of insured . . . for                                                           be construed to include
                                                   damages because                                                                sickness, disease . . .
                                                   of bodily injury
                                                   . . . caused by occurrence                                                     Occurrence means either
                                                                                                                                  an accident happening
                                                                                                                                  during the policy
                                                                                                                                  period or a continuous
                                                                                                                                  or repeated exposure
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
61 cases
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rochkind
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • March 31, 2019
    ...contained in that case. Indeed, almost immediately after quoting Zurich , the Mitchell Court quoted Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations , 451 F.Supp. 1230 (E.D. Mich. 1978), aff'd , 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir. 1980), which endorsed the pro rata method. Under defendants' logic, the Mi......
  • Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • December 14, 1988
    ...the contract was entered into. Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws § 311 (1934); e.g., Insurance Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc. 451 F.Supp. 1230, 1237 (E.D. Mich.1978), aff'd 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir. 1980). If the place of performance differs, however, the law of that pl......
  • Matter of Celotex Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Florida
    • November 15, 1994
    ...not being organized into cells, which does not have respiratory or nutrient circulation. Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 451 F.Supp. 1230, 1236-37 (E.D.Mich.1978), aff'd, 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir.1980), aff'd on reh'g, 657 F.2d 814 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied......
  • American Physicians Ins. Exchange v. Garcia
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1994
    ...(emphasis added), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007, 102 S.Ct. 1644, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); see also Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations, 451 F.Supp. 1230, 1243 (E.D.Mich.1978), aff'd, 633 F.2d 1212, 1226 n. 28 (6th Cir.1980), aff'd on reh'g, 657 F.2d 814 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 5
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Business Insurance
    • Invalid date
    ...Trigger Rule,” 45 Drake L. Rev. 625, 643 (1997). See: Sixth Circuit: Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 451 F. Supp. 1230, 1238 (E.D. Mich. 1978), aff’d 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir. 1980). Eighth Circuit: Continental Insurance Co. v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Ch......
  • CHAPTER 5 Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance: Coverage A for "Bodily Injury" or "Property Damage" Liabilities
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Insurance for Real Estate-Related Entities
    • Invalid date
    ...Trigger Rule,” 45 Drake L. Rev. 625, 643 (1997). See: Sixth Circuit: Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 451 F. Supp. 1230, 1238 (E.D. Mich. 1978), aff’d 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir. 1980). Eighth Circuit: Continental Insurance Co. v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Ch......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT