INSURANCE AGENTS'INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
| Decision Date | 23 October 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 14262.,14262. |
| Citation | 260 F.2d 736 |
| Parties | INSURANCE AGENTS' INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N. L. R. B., with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., and Melvin Pollack, Atty., N. L. R. B., were on the brief, for respondent.
Mr. Nahum A. Bernstein, New York City, for Prudential Ins. Co. of America, amicus curiae. Mr. K. Norman Diamond, Washington, D. C., was on the brief.
Before PRETTYMAN, WILBUR K. MILLER and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
Certiorari Granted January 26, 1959. See 79 S.Ct. 352.
This case involves the same question of law as was presented in Textile Workers Union of America, C.I.O. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1955, 97 U.S.App. D.C. 35, 227 F.2d 409, certiorari granted 350 U.S. 1004, 76 S.Ct. 650, 100 L.Ed. 867, certiorari vacated 1956, 352 U.S. 864, 77 S.Ct. 90, 1 L.Ed.2d 73. Amicus attempts to distinguish this case from Textile Workers Union, but we find no critical difference between the two cases. On the authority of that case, the order of the Board here under review must be set aside. One panel of this court will not attempt to overrule a recent precedent set by another panel, even though one or more of its members may disagree with the ruling.
So ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
National Organization for Women, Washington, D.C. Chapter v. Social Sec. Admin. of Dept. of Health and Human Services
...recent decision of one panel cannot be overruled by another panel, but only by the court en banc. E.g., Insurance Agents' Int'l Union v. NLRB, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 260 F.2d 736 (1958), aff'd, 361 U.S. 477, 80 S.Ct. 419, 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960); Davis v. Peerless Ins. Co., 103 U.S.App.D.C. 125......
-
National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents International Union, AFL-CIO
...Columbia Circuit also adhered to its decision in the Personal Products case, and, as in that case, set aside the Board's order. 104 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 260 F.2d 736. We granted the Board's petition for certiorari to review the important question presented. 358 U.S. 944, 79 S.Ct. 352, 3 L.Ed.2......
-
U.S. v. Caldwell
...72, 78, 471 F.2d 1040, 1046 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1112, 93 S.Ct. 923, 34 L.Ed.2d 693 (1973); Insurance Agents' Int'l Union v. NLRB, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 260 F.2d 736 (1959), aff'd, 361 U.S. 477, 80 S.Ct. 419, 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960); Mallory v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 71, 72,......
-
De Rodulfa v. United States
...216, 122 F.2d at 209; Barnett v. Hines, supra note 16, 70 App.D.C. at 220, 105 F.2d at 99. 100 See, e. g., Insurance Agents' Int'l v. NLRB, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 260 F.2d 736 (1958), aff'd, 361 U.S. 477, 80 S.Ct. 419, 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960); Davis v. Peerless Ins. Co., 103 U.S.App.D.C. 125, 1......