Insurance Co. of North America v. Twitty
| Decision Date | 18 July 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 74--1210,74--1210 |
| Citation | Insurance Co. of North America v. Twitty, 319 So.2d 141 (Fla. App. 1975) |
| Parties | INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a Foreign Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellants, v. James H. TWITTY, Plaintiff-Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Edna L. Caruso of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D'Aiuto and Dean, West Palm Beach, for defendants-appellants.
Richard W. Bates, Orlando, and Stenstrom, Davis & McIntosh, Sanford, for plaintiff-appellee.
This is an appeal from an order entered after a jury verdict against the defendant for damages in a personal injury action.
The defendant made an offer of judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P. 1.442 for 'the total amount of $4,000. including plaintiff's taxable costs accrued to the date hereof, as well as any outstanding liens.'The phrase 'any outstanding liens' referred to the personal injury protection benefits carrier's claim against the plaintiff.
The offer of judgment was not accepted and the jury returned a verdict of $2,500. in favor of the plaintiff.The plaintiff thereafter, filed his motion to tax costs as follows:
1. Clerk of Circuit Court, fee for
filing Complaint $ 20.00
2. State Insurance Commissioner, fee
for service of process on
Insurance Company of North America 5.00
3. Secretary of State, fee for
attempted nonresident service of
process of defendants, Mayfield
and Worthen 10.00
4. Postage for registered, return
receipt requested, deliver to
addressee only, mailing of copies of
Summons, Complaint and Notice
of Suit and Service of Process
to defendants, Mayfield and
Worthen 3.20
5. Mary Moore M. Ritchie, per diem
original and copy of deposition
of James Moore, M.D. 86.35
6. Rebecca D. Dickerson, per diem
original and copy of deposition of
George Debnam, M.D. 82.60
7. James Moore, M.D., expert
witness fee for deposition 60.00
8. George Starke, M.D., witness
fee and mileage for trial 12.52
9. Mary Moore M. Ritchie, per diem
originals and copies of depositions
of Dr. Moore and Dr. Debnam 130.75
----------
$ 410.42
The first four items of these costs, which amount to $38.20, were incurred by the plaintiff prior to the offer for judgment.
The plaintiff argues that the prevailing party is entitled to costs and cites F.S. 57.041:
'57.041 Costs: recovery from losing party
The defendant then filed its motion to tax costs against the plaintiff as follows:
"1) Cost of copy of deposition of
Dr. Moore $ 15.09
2) Cost of copy of deposition of
Dr. Debnam 16.80
3) Attorneys' fee for covering
depositions in North Carolina 287.50
4) Court Reporter's expense for
attendance at trial 135.00
Balance forwarded $ 454.39
---------------------------------- -----------
5) Costs of copies of depositions
of Dr. Moore and Dr. Debnam
(second time) 21.60
6) Attorneys fee subsequent to
Offer of Judgment 1,300.00
-----------
Total $ 1,775.99"
The defendant argues that these costs were incurred by them after its offer of judgment for $4,000. which was refused and prior to jury verdict of $2,500. in favor of the plaintiff.Defendant relies on F.R.C.P. 1.442.
'Rule 1.442.Offer of Judgment
At any time more than ten days before the trial begins a party defending against a claim may serve an offer on the adverse party to allow judgment to be taken against him for the money or property or to the effect specified in his offer with costs then accrued.If the adverse party serves written notice that offer is accepted within ten days after service of it, either party may then file the offer and notice of acceptance with proof of service and thereupon the clerk shall enter judgment.An offer not accepted shall be deemed withdrawn and evidence of it is not admissible except in a proceeding to determine costs.If the judgment finally obtained by the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Kay v. Katzen
...costs, not nontaxable costs as well. Horn v. Corkland Corp., 518 So.2d 418, 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Insurance Co. of North America v. Twitty, 319 So.2d 141, 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 22 (Fla.1976). Contrary to the defendant's argument, nothing we have said in Santiest......
-
Horn v. Corkland Corp.
...taxable costs incurred by the Horns prior to the offer as apportioned by the trial judge on remand. See Insurance Company of North America v. Twitty, 319 So.2d 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); see also Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Although Mary Horn was not a party at......
-
Wimbledon Townhouse Condominium I Ass'n, Inc. v. Kessler, 80-1673
...include 'costs then accrued'.Attorneys fees are not taxable costs under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Twitty, 319 So.2d 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 22 (Fla.1976). Accord Greenwood v. Stevenson, 88 F.R.D. 225 (D.R.I.1980); cf. Waters v......
-
Benitez v. State, 77-289
...trial judge. See White v. Walker, 5 Fla. 478 (1854); Crane v. Stulz, 136 So.2d 238 (Fla.2d DCA 1961); and Insurance Company of North America v. Twitty, 319 So.2d 141 (Fla.4th DCA 1975). ...