Insurance Company v. Nelson
Decision Date | 01 October 1880 |
Citation | 103 U.S. 544,26 L.Ed. 436 |
Parties | INSURANCE COMPANY v. NELSON |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. D. G. Hooker for the appellant.
Mr. John J. Ingalls for the appellee.
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, appellant, filed its bill in the court below for the foreclosure of a mortgage on certain lots in the city of Wyandotte, and a tract of land containing sixty acres situate outside that city, all in the county of Wyandotte, in the State of Kansas, alleged to have been executed by William Cook and Jane Cook, his wife, dated Dec. 10, 1874, to secure his bond for $5,000.
The city lots were his property, but the tract of sixty acres was the separate property of his wife.
She filed her answer, in which she admitted the execution of the bond, but denied the execution of the mortgage as set forth in the bill of complaint. Her account of the execution of the mortgage, as given in her answer, was as follows:——
Her answer further alleged as follows:——
'The said Alison Crockett was the agent of the plaintiff herein, in loaning money to her said husband, William Cook, and taking said mortgage in security therefor; and when he took said acknowledgment and made the representations aforesaid, that this defendant's land was not included in said mortgage, he was acting as the agent of the plaintiff herein, and that he then had full knowledge and well knew that the land above described (the sixty-acre tract) was the property of this defendant and was included in said mortgage.'
To this answer the general replication was filed.
William Cook having died before the commencement of the suit, George P. Nelson, administrator of his estate, and other defendants, answered; but their answers are immaterial, as no questions are involved in this appeal except such as arise upon the answer of Jane Cook.
Upon the issue, made by the pleadings, proofs were taken, and upon final hearing the court made a decree foreclosing the mortgage upon the city lots, but as to the sixty-acre tract the court found for defendant, Jane Cook, and declared that the mortgage was not a lien thereon, and omitted said tract from the decree of sale.
The insurance company, being dissatisfied with the decree of the court below, has brought the case here on appeal.
The defence relied on is, that the signature of Janue Cook to the mortgage was obtained by means of the false representations of her husband and by compulsion through the application of physical force, and that her acknowledgment was obtained by means of the false representations of her husband and the officer before whom she made it, in respect to the contents of the mortgage.
The defence rests mainly upon the answer, and upon the deposition of Mrs. Cook.
The only person present besides Mrs. Cook, when the mortgage was signed by her was her husband. There were only two persons present besides her when the acknowledgment of the mortgage was taken. These were her husband, and Alison Crockett, register of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lomax v. Southwest Missouri Electric Electric Company
... ... indubitable. 59 Central Law Journal, 404; Hiroland v ... Blake, 97 U.S. 624; Ins. Co. v. Nelson, 103 ... U.S. 544; Railroad v. Shay, 92 Pa. 198; Ivery v ... Phillips, 196 Pa. 1; Stull v. Thompson, 154 Pa ... 43; Albrecht v. Milwaukee & ... ...
-
Tr. Of The Ronald J. Lehn Declaration Of Trust Dated Ju1y 252002 v. Pension Plan
...certificate to be false or fraudulent” to contradict a certificate of acknowledgment to a conveyance of real estate); Ins. Co. v. Nelson, 103 U.S. 544, 26 L.Ed. 436 (1880) (finding that testimony by wife that husband physically forced her to sign a mortgage on her property was not enough to......
-
Metz v. Blackburn
... ... Lasley, 24 Wis. 654; Harter ... v. Cristoph, 32 Wis. , 245-248; Ins. Co. v ... Nelson, 103 U.S. 544; Smith v. Allis, 52 Wis ... 337; Ford v. Osborne, 45 O. St., 1.) ... ...
-
American Bell Tel. Co. v. National Mfg. Co.
... ... issued to the American Bell Telephone Company on November 17, ... 1891. Berliner's application says, of the instruments ... shown in the ... inconclusive evidence. ' Howland v. Blake, 97 ... U.S. 624-626, 24 L.Ed. 1027; Insurance Co. v ... Nelson, 103 U.S. 544, 26 L.Ed. 436; Coyle v ... Davis, 116 U.S. 108, 6 Sup.Ct ... ...