Insurance Company v. Weide
| Decision Date | 01 December 1869 |
| Citation | 9 Wall. 677,76 U.S. 677,19 L.Ed. 810 |
| Parties | INSURANCE COMPANY v. WEIDE |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
ERROR to the Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota.
Charles Weide and Joseph Weide, of Minnesota, brought suit in one of the State courts of Minnesota against the AEtna Insurance Company, on a policy of insurancee, to recover $10,000 insured upon a stock of goods lost by fire within the conditions of the policy. The suit was removed to the Federal court under the 12th section of the Judiciary Act, which enacts that suits such as the present was may be transferred, and that copies of the process being filed in the Circuit Court, 'the cause shall proceed there in the same manner as if it had been brought there by original process.'
A copy of the process, and of the complaint in the State court, were filed in the Circuit, and the company, the defendant, appeared there and put in its answer to the complaint; but no new declaration was filed.
On the trial, the counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss the cause from the docket, on the ground that a new complaint or declaration, properly entitled, had not been filed in the Circuit; but the motion was denied.
The principal question in the case, however, was as to the admissibility of evidence. Both the plaintiffs in the court below were witnesses to prove the value of the goods in the store lost by the fire. All the books of account were burnt, except two day-books and a ledger. The day-books covered entries of sales and purchases in the store from 1865 down to the day of the fire, which was on the 22d of February, 1867. The ledger began the 1st of October, 1866, and contained a merchandise account, posted from the day-books, also coming down to the time of the fire. Joseph Weide, one of the plaintiffs, testified that the value of the goods at the time of the fire, according to the books, was $45,564.64, and with profits added, would amount of $70,000; that the cash inventory of the goods, the last of February, 1866, amounted to $75,500; that he got the amount from the fly-leaf of the ledger, upon which, in July, 1866, he made an abstract from the inventories for several years before the fire; and that these inventories were destroyed by it. The witness identified the day-books and ledger, and testified that these books were kept by him and his partner, as they had no clerk; that they were the books kept in their business, and that they were correct; that the entries in the day-books were the original entries of purchases and sales; that he could not state from recollection the amount or value of the stock on hand at the time of the fire, nor at the time of taking the last inventory, in February, 1866, nor by the purchases and sales after that inventory. This witness was cross-examined, among other things, as to the entries in the ledger, and as to the entries on the fly-leaf, and as to the correctness of these entries, and of the amounts therein stated. The evidence on the cross-examination is not stated in the bill of exceptions.
Charles Weide, the other member of the firm, was also examined, and, as the record stated, gave, in substance, the same testimony as Joseph.
Other witnesses were called, and gave evidence as to the value of the goods in the store at the time of the fire.
The plaintiffs then offered in evidence the fly-leaf of the ledger, a copy of which was in the record. The defendant objected to the same as incompetent and immaterial, and not made at the date of the transaction. The court admitted it. They also offered in evidence the two day-books and ledger, which were objected to, but admitted.
Verdict and judgment having been given for the plaintiff, the insurance company brought the case here.
Messrs. Brisbin and Lamprey, for the plaintiff in error:
1. Upon the transfer the action should have proceeded as if then originally commenced in the Circuit Court. A new complaint or declaration should have been filed. This was not done....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rumely v. United States
... ... mortgage 6 per cent. notes of the company. Later McClure ... assigned his interest in the option to Rumely. The contention ... of the ... Bates v. Preble, 151 U.S ... 149, 151, 14 Sup.Ct. 277, 38 L.Ed. 106; Insurance Co. v ... Weide, 14 Wall. 375, 20 L.Ed. 894; Insurance Co. v ... Weide, 9 Wall. 677, 681, 19 ... ...
-
Nourse v. Riddell
...440, 18 L.Ed. 221; Dwyer v. Dunbar, 5 Wall. 318, 18 L.Ed. 489; Gardner v. Collector, 6 Wall. 499, 508, 18 L.Ed. 890; Insurance Co. v. Weide, 9 Wall. 677, 680, 19 L.Ed. 810; Insurance Companies v. Weides, 14 Wall. 375, 380, 20 L.Ed. 894, Stitt v. Huidekopher, 17 Wall. 384, 21 L.Ed. 644; Corn......
-
Read v. State Insurance Co.
...72 N.W. 665 103 Iowa 307 READ & TRAVERSY AND J. A. CAMPBELL, Trustee, v. THE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant Supreme Court of Iowa, Des MoinesOctober 19, 1897 ... Appeal ... from Polk District Court.--HON. C. P. HOLMES, ... will fix the loss suffered thereby. See Levine v ... Insurance Co., supra; Insurance Co. v ... Weide, 76 U.S. 677, 9 Wall. 677, 19 L.Ed. 810; ... Insurance Co. v. Weide, 81 U.S. 375, 14 Wall. 375, ... 20 L.Ed. 894. The possibility of a great many ... ...
-
Bee Publishing Company v. World Publishing Company
... ... 528; Culver v. Marks, 122 Ind. 554, 23 N.E. 1086; ... Brayton v. Sherman, 23 N.E. 471; Poor v ... Robinson, 13 Bush 290; [59 Neb. 723] Insurance Co ... v. Weide, 9 Wall. [U. S.], 677, 19 L.Ed. 810; Anchor ... Mill Co. v. Walsh, 108 Mo. 277, 18 S.W. 904; ... Greenville v. Ormand, 51 S.C ... ...