Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins.
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts |
| Citation | 356 Mass. 184,248 N.E.2d 500 |
| Parties | INSURANCE RATING BOARD et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE. |
| Decision Date | 06 June 1969 |
Page 500
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE.
Decided June 6, 1969.
[356 Mass. 185]
Page 502
Herbert P. Wilkins, Boston, (George M. Hughes, Boston, with him) for Insurance Rating Bd. and others.Allan G. Rodgers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for Comr. of Ins.
Nathan S. Paven, Boston, for American Trial Lawyers Assn., Massachusetts Chapter, Inc., amicus curiae, submitted a brief.
Before [356 Mass. 184] SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.
[356 Mass. 185] SPIEGEL, Justice.
These are proceedings brought by the Insurance Rating Board (board), the Mutual Insurance Rating Bureau (bureau) and several insurance companies to determine whether the Commissioner of Insurance (commissioner) had authority to 'freeze' certain automobile insurance rates. One is a suit for declaratory relief. The other two proceedings are under G.L. c. 175, § 113B, and [356 Mass. 186] G.L. c. 175A, § 19. The proceedings were reserved and reported by the single justice without decision upon the pleadings and a statement of agreed facts.
The board and the bureau are associations of insurance companies. They are rating organizations licensed under G.L. c. 175A to file rates with the commissioner, on behalf of their members and subscribers, for various kinds of insurance, including automobile property damage liability insurance. 1 They have in the past made 'rate filings' for automobile property damage liability insurance.
Statute 1968, c. 643, was approved on July 16, 1968. Section 2A of that act directed the commissioner to 'fix and establish the same classifications of risks and the same basic premium charges or lesser charges * * * in connection with the issue or execution of motor vehicle liability policies or bonds, both as defined in * * * (G.L. c. 90, § 34A) as he fixed and established * * * for * * * (1967).' Section 3 of the act amended G.L. c. 175, 113C, to require insurance companies authorized to issue compulsory bodily injury liability coverage policies or bonds 'to issue to any person purchasing such policy or bond, at his option, additional coverage * * * of property damage, so called, to a limit of at least five thousand dollars. The rates for such additional coverage shall be
Page 503
subject to the approval of the commissioner, under the provisions of * * * (§ 113B).' 2[356 Mass. 187] On October 14, 1968, the effective date of St.1968, c. 643, the board and the bureau 'made * * * rule filing(s) covering the rating of the additional property damage liability coverage described in G.L. c. 175, § 113C, as amended by St.1968, c. 643, § 3.' The rating rules provided that the rates for such coverage would be the rates shown in the 'Massachusetts Automobile Property Damage Manual.' These filings were approved by the commissioner and were effective as of October 14, 1968.
On November 25, 1968, the commissioner filed in his office a 'Memorandum in Regard to Classifications of Risks and Schedule of Permium Charges for Motor Vehicle Liability Policies or Bonds as Defined in * * * (G.L. c. 90, § 34A) for the Year 1969, and Property Damage Liability * * * Coverage.' The commissioner purported to 'establish and promulgate' for 1969 the classifications of risks, premium charges and rules and regulations applicable to 'motor vehicle liability policies or bonds' as defined in G.L. c. 90, § 34A, which were in effect for 1967. He also purported to 'establish, reaffirm and approve' for 1969 the classifications of risks, premium charges and rules and regulations applicable to automobile property damage liability insurance (as defined by G.L. c. 175, § 113C, as amended by St.1968, c. 643, § 3) which were in effect for 1967.
On December 26, 1968, the board and the bureau each [356 Mass. 188] delivered to the commissioner purported filings regarding automobile property damage liability insurance. Each filed separately under G.L. c. 175A and under G.L. c. 175, § 113C. The commissioner returned the documents, stating that they were 'inconsistent with * * * (his) Memorandum and Order of November 25, 1968.'
1. The commissioner contends that the rate 'freeze' provision of St.1968, c. 643, § 2A, applies to automobile property damage liability insurance. He argues that the Legislature, when it used the words 'policies or bonds' as opposed to 'coverage' (compare St.1968, c. 643, § 2A with St.1968, c. 643, § 3) intended the words 'policies or bonds' to include all coverages contained in policies or bonds which contain the compulsory bodily injury liability coverage, and not just the compulsory bodily injury liability coverage. He assigns a similar meaning to the same words in G.L. c. 175, § 113B, and asserts that under that section, prior to
Page 504
the passage of c. 643, 'he had the power theoretically' to fix and establish the rates for all coverages included with the compulsory bodily injury liability coverage in a single policy or bond.We think that the words must be limited to the compulsory bodily injury liability coverage under G.L. c. 90, § 34A. In Benoit v. Fisher, 341 Mass. 386, 388, 169 N.E.2d 905, this court stated that the requirements of G.L. c. 175, § 113A(2), did not apply to property damage coverage. Similarly in Lodge v. Bern, 328 Mass. 42, 43--44, 101 N.E.2d 748, 749, the provision of G.L. c. 175, § 113A, which forbids exceptions or exclusions from the compulsory coverage was said to have 'no application to the coverage in excess of the required $5,000.' In both cases, this court limited the words 'motor vehicle liability policy as defined in * * * (G.L. c. 90, § 34A)' as they appear in § 113A to the compulsory bodily injury liability coverage. See also Macheras v. Syrmopoulos, 319 Mass. 485, 486--487, 66 N.E.2d 351, 2 A.L.R.2d 511. The words there are essentially the same words as the Legislature used in St.1968, c. 643, § 2A, and G.L. c. 175, § 113B, as amended by St.1968, c. 643, § 2. Where the Legislature uses the same words in several sections which [356 Mass. 189] concern the same subject matter, the words 'must be presumed to have been used with the same meaning in each section.' Liddell v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co., 283 Mass. 340, 346, 187 N.E. 39, 42. The commissioner was neither required nor authorized by St.1968, c. 643, § 2A, to 'freeze' the automobile property damage liability insurance rates.
2. General Laws c. 175, § 113C, as amended by St.1968, c. 643, § 3...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McCavitt v. Registrars of Voters of Brockton
...Cross of Mass., Inc., --- Mass. ---, ---, Mass.Adv.Sh. (1981) 317, 323, 416 N.E.2d 1352; Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969). Hence, we believe that the Legislature did not intend to limit the hand recount of punch card ballots authorized ......
-
Com. v. Angiulo
...presume that the Legislature does not intend "to enact a barren and ineffective provision." Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969). See O'Shea v. Holyoke, 345 Mass. 175, 179, 186 N.E.2d 608 (1962). To conclude that the information given to th......
-
School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Ed.
...Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commn., 354 Mass. 408, 414, 237 N.E.2d 669. See also Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500, and cases cited. If, as the board urges, however, the statute does not limit the authority of school committees to redraw......
-
Commonwealth v. Domino, SJC–11215.
...offense). See Commonwealth v. Wynton W., 459 Mass. 745, 747, 947 N.E.2d 561 (2011), quoting Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 188–189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969) (“Where the Legislature uses the same words in several sections which concern the same subject matter, the ......
-
McCavitt v. Registrars of Voters of Brockton
...Cross of Mass., Inc., --- Mass. ---, ---, Mass.Adv.Sh. (1981) 317, 323, 416 N.E.2d 1352; Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969). Hence, we believe that the Legislature did not intend to limit the hand recount of punch card ballots authorized ......
-
School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Ed.
...Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commn., 354 Mass. 408, 414, 237 N.E.2d 669. See also Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500, and cases cited. If, as the board urges, however, the statute does not limit the authority of school committees to redraw......
-
Com. v. Angiulo
...presume that the Legislature does not intend "to enact a barren and ineffective provision." Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969). See O'Shea v. Holyoke, 345 Mass. 175, 179, 186 N.E.2d 608 (1962). To conclude that the information given to th......
-
Eaton v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, SJC–11041.
...section.’ ” Commonwealth v. Wynton W., 459 Mass. 745, 747, 947 N.E.2d 561 (2011), quoting Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 188–189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969). See Booma v. Bigelow–Sanford Carpet Co., 330 Mass. 79, 82, 111 N.E.2d 742 (1953) (“It is a familiar canon of......