Int'l Harvester Co. of Am. v. Hecker

Decision Date01 March 1917
Citation36 N.D. 95,161 N.W. 1007
PartiesINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CO. OF AMERICA v. HECKER et al.
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.

Where a well-to-do farmer joins with his wife in conveying all their real and personal property to their son as a device to hinder and delay creditors, the device is of no avail.

Appeal from District Court, Dunn County; W. C. Crawford, Judge.

Action by the International Harvester Company of America, against George Hecker, Francisca Hecker, and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed, without prejudice to the title of Francisca Hecker.H. C. Berry and F. C. Heffron, both of Dickinson, for appellants. Miller, Zuger & Tillotson, of Bismarck, for respondent.

ROBINSON, J.

The plaintiff brings this suit as a judgment creditor to subject certain lands and property to sale on its judgment for $693.51 against George Hecker. In August, 1913, the judgment was obtained for an old debt, and an execution was issued and returned unsatisfied. In June, 1913, George Hecker and Francisca, his wife, made to their son, Lieber, a deed purporting to convey to him over a section of land, described in the complaint, worth about $10,000, and a lot of personal property; the consideration being that he would care for them during their life. The court gave judgment for the plaintiff. The parents and the son appeal.

They insist that the transaction was in good faith, and that it was not made to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, and that the proof fails to show that George Hecker had any title to the land. The proof clearly shows that after the transfer George Hecker and wife continued to live on the land and to farm it in the same manner as before the transfer, which was only a shallow device to hinder and delay creditors.

Though it appears that George Hecker was the owner of said property, yet, to guard against any possible injury to Mrs. Hecker. this court directs the following sentence to be added to the judgment herein, viz.: This judgment is without prejudice to any title Francisca Hecker may have had in any of said lands or property.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT