Inter-Ocean Cas. Co. v. Ervin

Decision Date11 October 1934
Docket Number4 Div. 769.
Citation229 Ala. 312,156 So. 844
PartiesINTER-OCEAN CASUALTY CO. v. ERVIN.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coffee County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

Action on a policy of accident and health insurance by Joel Ervin against the Inter-Ocean Casualty Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Transferred from Court of Appeals under section 7326, Code of 1923.

Affirmed.

J. T Jackson, of Dothan, for appellant.

Beck &amp Yarbrough, of Enterprise, for appellee.

BOULDIN Justice.

The action was to recover the death benefit under a policy of accident and health insurance. On the trial the court gave the affirmative charge, with hypothesis, for plaintiff.

The substantial issue was presented under plea 4, and special replication thereto.

Plea 4 among other things, relies upon a misrepresentation in the application saying: "Neither my hearing nor vision is impaired." In fact the insured was deaf and dumb. The replication, on which issue was joined, recited:

"Plaintiff says further that if it is stated in said application that the hearing of said applicant was not impaired that said statement was written therein by defendant's said agent without the knowledge or consent of said applicant or this plaintiff. That at the time of making said application or the day before, defendant's agent, acting within the line and scope of his duty, asked the said Mary Jane Ervin in the presence of the plaintiff if her hearing was impaired and that the said Mary Jane Ervin informed him that she could not hear and that at the same time the plaintiff informed said agent that said applicant could not hear and that said agent was fully informed of the truth of applicant's physical condition and that if incorrect answers were written into said application said applicant and this plaintiff knew nothing about it and if a fraud was practiced in procuring the policy they did not in any way participate therein."

The evidence, without dispute, disclosed that the insured, a negro woman, Mary Jane Ervin, could not read or write, neither could her brother, the plaintiff and beneficiary; that the soliciting agent of the insurer filled out the application in the presence of both; that the brother informed the agent the applicant was deaf and dumb; that answers to questions were given through the brother, he and his sister using sign language; that neither of them had any knowledge that the agent inserted in or failed to strike from the application the clause relied upon by defendant.

It is fully settled in this jurisdiction that misrepresentations resulting solely from the act or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Jersey Ins. Co. v. Roddam, 6 Div. 199
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 11 October 1951
    ...such was not the case. But be that as it may, in this jurisdiction we have long followed a contrary view. In Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. Ervin, 229 Ala. 312, 313, 156 So. 844, 845, this court, speaking through the late Mr. Justice Bouldin to a somewhat analogous question, declared: 'It is f......
  • National Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Allen
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 16 April 1970
    ...issuing the insurance acts on the application as presented and without knowledge of the agent's misfeasance. Inter-Ocean Casualty Company v. Ervin, 229 Ala. 312, 156 So. 844; Jersey Insurance Company v. Roddam, 256 Ala. 634, 56 So.2d Here, it was undisputed that the insured could not read, ......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Newell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 10 March 1960
    ...jury question was presented. See: Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Crow, 231 Ala. 144, 147, 164 So. 83; Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. Ervin, 229 Ala. 312, 313, 156 So. 844. We see no need to enter into an extended discussion of any question as to ratification by defendant of the oral ......
  • United Sec. Life Ins. Co. v. St. Clair
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 21 February 1961
    ...issuing the insurance acts on the application as presented and without knowledge of the agent's misfeasance. Inter-Ocean Casualty Company v. Ervin, 229 Ala. 312, 156 So. 844; Jersey Insurance Company v. Roddam, 256 Ala. 634, 56 So.2d Counsel for appellant further argues, under this assignme......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT