Intercontinental Transportation Co. v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 102
| Decision Date | 08 December 1961 |
| Docket Number | Docket 27072.,No. 102,102 |
| Citation | 297 F.2d 249 |
| Parties | INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc., Owner of THE S.S. NATALIE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. STATES MARINE LINES, INC., Respondent-Appellant, and Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, for respondent-appellant, States Marine Lines, Inc., James J. Higgins, Advocate. L. De Grove Potter, New York City, of counsel.
Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, for appellee. Nicholas J. Healy, III, Raymond J. Burke, Thomas A. Dillon, Jr., New York City, Advocates.
Zock, Petrie, Sheneman & Reid, New York City, for Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., Francis J. O'Brien, New York City, Advocate.
Before SWAN, WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
The order is so clearly correct that it would have been affirmed at the conclusion of the arguments, except for a question as to whether it was an appealable order. Farr & Co. v. Cia Intercontinental De Navegacion, 2 Cir., 243 F.2d 342 disposes of that question. Order affirmed on Judge Murphy's opinion, 200 F.Supp. 88.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Durham County v. Richards & Associates, Inc.
...the Arbitration Act. Farr & Co. v. Cia. Intercontinental de Navegacion, 243 F.2d 342 (2 Cir.1957); Intercontinental Transportation Co. v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 297 F.2d 249 (2 Cir.1961). As Judge Friendly went on to note in Chatham, the Supreme Court has held that an order to arbitrate......
-
Chatham Shipping Co. v. Fertex Steamship Corp.
...Arbitration Act. Farr & Co. v. Cia. Intercontinental de Navegacion, 243 F.2d 342 (2 Cir. 1957); Intercontinental Transportation Co. v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 297 F.2d 249 (2 Cir. 1961). The Farr decision is not without logical support and is in line with the general current of authority......