Intern. Business Machines v. Jennifer-Ashley Co., 94 Civ. 4850 (VLB).
Decision Date | 12 January 1995 |
Docket Number | No. 94 Civ. 4850 (VLB).,94 Civ. 4850 (VLB). |
Parties | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, v. JENNIFER-ASHLEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Paul C. Saunders, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for plaintiff.
Edward J.M. Little, Zuckerman, Spaeder, Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker, New York City, for defendant.
This case arises from a dispute concerning three contracts entered into between the plaintiff, International Business Machines ("IBM"), and defendant, Jennifer-Ashley Company ("JACO"), under which defendant was to distribute surplus parts and materials generated and provided by IBM.
IBM terminated the contracts and brought this action for breach of contract seeking unpaid revenues allegedly due under the contracts. JACO filed eight counterclaims, the eighth of which alleges:
IBM has moved for judgment on the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) as to the above counterclaim.
IBM's Rule 12(c) motion is treated as embracing a motion to dismiss under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). IBM's motion is granted insofar as it seeks dismissal of the eighth counterclaim. IBM's request for judgment on the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) is denied without prejudice since neither party has provided material facts necessary to decide the claim on the merits, as is required for a judgment on the pleadings under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c). Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc., 842 F.2d 639, 642 (2d Cir.1988).
JACO was an independent contractor of IBM. Under these circumstances a claim can exist only under N.Y.Exec.Law § 296(13) which provides:
The statute contains language which appears to cover individual discrimination without regard to whether any boycott or other combination is involved, but sets forth boycotting as a separate element which would in that event appear to be surplusage, an interpretation courts seek to avoid. Under such circumstances legislative history may be significant, and tends to suggest that a boycott or similar combination is necessary for a violation to be established. Mehtani v. N.Y. Life Insurance Co., 145 A.D.2d 90, 537 N.Y.S.2d 800, 803 (1st Dept.1989). Assembly Debate Transcripts, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant's Reply Memorandum in support of its motion for judgment on the pleadings, Exhibit C, 94 Civ. 4850, Docket # 16.
State court rulings on the subject are conflicting. See generally Holly v. Pennysaver Corp., 98 A.D.2d 570, 471 N.Y.S.2d 611, 613 (2nd Dept.1984); Mehtani v. N.Y. Life Insurance Co., 145 A.D.2d 90, 537 N.Y.S.2d 800, 803 (1st Dept.1989); West v. Mohawk Commercial Carpets, 183 A.D.2d 182, 589 N.Y.S.2d 218, 219 (3d Dept.1992); Harvey v. NYRAC, 813 F.Supp. 206, 212 (E.D.N.Y. 1993).
It would be inappropriate to construe a statute presenting significant ambiguities based on a bare record providing no indication as to what kind of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mitchell v. Keane
...of Pharmaceutical Mfrs., Inc. v. Ayerst Laboratories, 850 F.2d 904, 909 n. 2 (2d Cir.1988); International Business Machines, Corp. v. Jennifer-Ashley Co., 872 F.Supp. 1256, 1257 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). The moving party bears a substantial burden of proof on such a motion. A court may not dismiss a......
-
Garvey v. Face of Beauty, LLC
... ... to interfere with Defendants' business". (AC ... ¶¶ 11, 2527.) ... \xC2" ... relief can be granted.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). To ... survive a Rule 12(b)(6) ... Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. , 753 ... v. International Business Machines ... Corp. , 166 F.Supp.2d 891, 898 ... v ... Jennifer-Ashley Co. , 872 F.Supp. 1256, 1258 (S.D.N.Y ... ...
-
Cityr Grp. Holdings LLC v. Foresite Realty Mgmt., LLC.
...motion as a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, and evaluates it under those standards, see Int 7 Bus. Machines Corp. v. Jennifer-Ashley Co., 872 F. Supp. 1256, 1257 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) ("[Plaintiff's] Rule 12(c) motion is treated as embracing a [Rule 12(b)(6)] motion to dismiss."); see also Andro......