International Broth. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America-Airline Div. v. Southwest Airlines Co., AMERICA-AIRLINE
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH |
Citation | 853 F.2d 283 |
Parties | 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2200, 109 Lab.Cas. P 10,693 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OFDIVISION and Teamsters Local 19, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. |
Decision Date | 09 August 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 87-1085,AMERICA-AIRLINE |
Page 283
WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA-AIRLINE
DIVISION and Teamsters Local 19,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Fifth Circuit.
J. Joe Harris, San Antonio, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
James L. Hicks, Jr., Hal K. Gillespie, Dallas, Tex., Wilma B. Liebman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Jerry L. Buchmeyer, Judge.
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion April 21, 5 Cir., 1988, 842 F.2d 794)
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Miami v. F.O.P. Miami Lodge 20, No. 85-2863
...Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Southwest Airlines Co., 842 F.2d 794, 799, rehearing en banc granted, 853 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1988). Instead, this case, unlike its more exotic relatives living under the same key number, involves the quite ordinary issue of ......
-
Transport Workers' Union of Philadelphia, Local 234 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Authority, No. 88-1206
...court's ruling in International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Southwest Airlines Co., 842 F.2d 794, 804 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 853 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1988), that such broad management rights clauses cannot serve to exempt management from the RLA prohibition against unilateral insti......
-
Allied Pilots Ass'n v. American Airlines, Inc., Civ. A. No. CA 3-88-1914-G.
...Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Airline Division v. Southwest Airlines Co., 842 F.2d 794, 803 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 853 F.2d 283 (5th Major disputes arise when there is either no collective bargaining agreement or a change in the terms of an existing agreement is sought.......
-
City of Miami v. F.O.P. Miami Lodge 20, No. 85-2863
...Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Southwest Airlines Co., 842 F.2d 794, 799, rehearing en banc granted, 853 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1988). Instead, this case, unlike its more exotic relatives living under the same key number, involves the quite ordinary issue of ......
-
Transport Workers' Union of Philadelphia, Local 234 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Authority, No. 88-1206
...court's ruling in International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Southwest Airlines Co., 842 F.2d 794, 804 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 853 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1988), that such broad management rights clauses cannot serve to exempt management from the RLA prohibition against unilateral insti......
-
Allied Pilots Ass'n v. American Airlines, Inc., Civ. A. No. CA 3-88-1914-G.
...Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Airline Division v. Southwest Airlines Co., 842 F.2d 794, 803 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 853 F.2d 283 (5th Major disputes arise when there is either no collective bargaining agreement or a change in the terms of an existing agreement is sought.......