Interstate Commerce Commission v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc.

Decision Date21 October 1963
Docket NumberNo. 40,Docket 28197.,40
PartiesINTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERSTATE AUTO SHIPPERS, INC. and Alfred M. Rappeport, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Emanuel Rothstein, New York City, for defendants-appellants.

Seymour Glanzer, Atty., Interstate Commerce Commission, New York City (Bernard A. Gould, Atty., Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D. C., and Morton B. Margulies, Atty., Interstate Commerce Commission, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CLARK, MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The preliminary injunction restraining defendants is affirmed on the well reasoned opinion of District Judge Levet, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 214 F.Supp. 473.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • ICC v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 20, 1965
    ...which it is sufficient at this point to cite ICC v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc., 214 F.Supp. 473 (S.D. N.Y.), aff'd per curiam, 323 F.2d 367 (2 Cir.1963). But none of this settled doctrine decides whether or not a particular "driveaway" operation is a "for-hire transportation business by......
  • ICC v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 5, 1964
    ...operations. The Commission's reliance on ICC v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc., 214 F. Supp. 473 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd per curiam, 323 F.2d 367 (2 Cir. 1963), is misplaced, and that case is not controlling here. The facts there are markedly different from those in the case at bar and impelled q......
  • ICC v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 5, 1964
    ...The Commission's reliance on ICC v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc., 214 F. 234 F. Supp. 74 Supp. 473 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd per curiam, 323 F.2d 367 (2 Cir. 1963), is misplaced, and that case is not controlling here. The facts there are markedly different from those in the case at bar and impell......
  • Auto Drive-Away Company of Hialeah, Inc. v. ICC, 22311.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 10, 1966
    ...operation requires ICC authorization. See ICC v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc., S.D.N.Y.1963, 214 F.Supp. 473, aff'd per curiam, 2 Cir., 323 F.2d 367; ICC v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc., 2 Cir.1965, 340 F.2d 820. The defendants instead attack the admissibility of most of the materials o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT