Inv. Assocs. v. Summit Assocs., Inc.

• Decision Date: 12 January 2012
• Citation: 34 A.3d 396,303 Conn. 921
• Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
• Parties: INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES v. SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.

303 Conn. 921

34 A.3d 396

INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES

v.SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided Jan. 12, 2012.

Proloy K. Das and Bernard F. Gaffney, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Pasquale Young, New Haven, in opposition.

The petition by the defendant Joseph D. Lancia for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 192, 31 A.3d 820 (AC 32227), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 52–598(c) is procedural in nature, and, therefore, may be applied retroactively?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's 2009 motion to revive?

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant for purposes of adjudicating the plaintiff's 2009 motion to revive?”