Iowa Utilities Bd. v. F.C.C., s. 96-3321

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
Citation120 F.3d 753
Docket Number96-3430,96-3901,96-3460,96-3410,96-3414,96-3444,96-3453,96-3416,96-3424,96-3436,96-3696,96-3708,96-3756,96-3608,96-3519,96-3507,96-3709,96-3906 and 96-3982,96-3406,96-3520,Nos. 96-3321,96-3418,96-3450,96-3603,s. 96-3321
Parties, 1997-2 Trade Cases P 71,876, 8 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1179 IOWA UTILITIES BOARD, Petitioner, Bell Atlantic Corporation; Bellsouth Corporation; Pacific Telesis Group; SBC Communications, Inc.; Maryland Public Service Commission; US West, Inc.; US Telephone Association; Arkansas Public Service Commission; ALLTEL Telephone Services Corporation; Ameritech Corporation; Oregon Public Utility Commission; North State Telephone Company; Western Alliance; Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance; Roseville Telephone Company; Concord Telephone Company; Rock Hill Telephone Company; Public Utilities Commission of the State of Hawaii; American Public Communications Council, Inc.; ICG Telecom Group, Inc.; Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; Southern New England Telephone Company; The Ad Hoc Coalition of Telecommunications Manufacturing Companies; Pacific Telecom, Inc.; Minnesota Independent Coalition; Kentucky Public Service Commission; Kansas Corporation Commission; Public Service Commission of the State of Wyoming; Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission; Public Service Commission of Wisconsin; State of Texas; Alabama Public Service Commission; Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg; New Mexico State Corporation Commission; Public Service Commission of the State of Montana; GTE Service Corporation; Utah Department of Commerce, Division of Public Utilities; Public Service Commission of Utah; Public Service Commission of the State of South Carolina; Tennessee Regulatory Authority; Aging Forum, Inc., doing business as National Silver Haired Congress; U.S. Coalition on Aging; College for Living; Council of Silver Haired Legislatures; Missouri Alliance of Area Agencies on Aging; Missouri Association for the Deaf; Missouri Council of the Blind; Presidents' Club for Telecommunications Justice; Paraquad, Rural Advocates for Independent Living; Services for Independent Living; Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado; Department of Public Utilities of t
Decision Date14 October 1997

To continue reading

Request your trial
126 cases
  • Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Dept. of Public Utility Control
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • 23 Julio 2002
    ...... from the decision of the defendant, the department of public utilities control (department), ordering the plaintiff to file a proposed tariff for ... v. Iowa Utilities Board, 525 U.S. 366, 397, 119 S.Ct. 721, 142 L.Ed.2d 834 (1999) ... sharing arrangement between the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the state commissioners. MCI Worldcom Network Service s, Inc. v. ......
  • Verizon North, Inc. v. Strand, 5:98CV38.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District Michigan)
    • 6 Diciembre 2000
    ......Unless the State law is inconsistent with the FTA or FCC regulations, states are free to impose their own requirements that foster ....         "The record reflects that the PUC [Public Utilities Commission] has not merely adopted a short-form interconnection agreement, ....         This issue was addressed in Iowa Utils. Bd. v. F.C.C., 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir.1997) ( "Iowa Utilities I" ), ......
  • U S West Communications, Inc. v. Tcg Oregon
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Oregon)
    • 30 Enero 1998
    ...... United States of America and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) move to intervene. I grant the FCC's motion to intervene, deny the ...v. Thoms, No. 4:97-CV-70082, 1997 WL 880744 (S.D.Iowa, Mar.17, 1997); U S West Communications, Inc. v. Reinbold, No. A1-97-25 ...      TCG contends that the Eighth Circuit's decision Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Comm'n, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir.1997) ......
  • Michigan Bell Tele. Co. v. Mfs Intelenet of Mich.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District Michigan)
    • 21 Julio 1998
    ...... Id.; Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 1997). . ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Telecom Antitrust Handbook. Third Edition
    • 9 Diciembre 2019
    ...AT&T, 1997 WL 599618 (E.D. La. 1997), 396 Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States, 306 U.S. 208, 221 (1939), 158 Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 1997), 88 Iris Wireless v. Syniverse Techs., 49 F. Supp. 3d 1022 (M.D. Fla. 2014), 134, 146 J Jackson Hill Rd. Sharon CT, LLC v. ......
  • Decentralization and Deference: How Different Conceptions of Federalism Matter for Deference and Why That Matters for Renewable Energy
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 47-11, November 2017
    • 1 Noviembre 2017
    ...reaction). 221. Id . at 16 (quoting H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-458, at 113 (1996)); see also Iowa Utils. Bd. v. Federal Commc’ns Comm’n, 120 F.3d 753, 791 (8th Cir. 1997) (“Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 . . . which was designed, in part, to erode the monopolistic nature of......
  • Regulation of and Monopolization in Telecom and Media Markets
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Telecom Antitrust Handbook. Third Edition
    • 9 Diciembre 2019
    ...90. See generally AT&T v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366, 375-77 (1999). 91. Id. at 374. 92. See id. at 374 (citing Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, 120 F.3d 753, 795 (8th Cir. 1997)). 93. Id . at 378. The Supreme Court further held that the FCC had “jurisdiction to design a pricing methodology” for ......
  • Essential facilities.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 51 No. 5, May 1999
    • 1 Mayo 1999
    ...First Report and Order, 11 F.C.C.R. 15,499 (1996). For the appeal of the FCC's First Report and Order, see Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 1997), rev'd in part, affirmed in part sub nom. AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 118 S. Ct. 879 (183.) Armen A. Alchian, Cost, in 3 INT......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT