Ippolito v. Ippolito

Decision Date13 October 1992
CitationIppolito v. Ippolito, 615 A.2d 1047, 224 Conn. 905 (Conn. 1992)
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesEllen Ann IPPOLITO v. Raymond Joseph IPPOLITO.

Richard L. Goldblatt, Hamden, in support of the petition.

Lee Marlow, New Haven, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn.App. 745, 612 A.2d 131, is denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
38 cases
  • O'Brien v. O'Brien
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • October 16, 2012
    ...according to the circumstances of each case. See Ippolito v. Ippolito, 28 Conn.App. 745, 751, 612 A.2d 131, cert. denied, 224 Conn. 905, 615 A.2d 1047 (1992). A court properly may award lifetime alimony even when the recipient has an earning capacity. See McMellon v. McMellon, 116 Conn.App.......
  • Foote v. Comm'r of Correction
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • November 30, 2010
    ...749, 612 A.2d 131 (start of 120 day deadline delayed by lack of objection to defendant's unsolicited brief), cert. denied, 224 Conn. 905, 615 A.2d 1047 (1992). Likewise, these observations are consistent with "the clear intent of [§ 51-183b, which is] to place the onus on judges to decide c......
  • Paniccia v. Success Vill. Apartments, Inc.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • October 11, 2022
    ...749, 612 A.2d 131 (start of 120 day deadline delayed by lack of objection to defendant's unsolicited brief), cert. denied, 224 Conn. 905, 615 A.2d 1047 (1992)...."[T]hese observations are consistent with the clear intent of [ § 51-183b, which is] to place the onus on judges to decide cases ......
  • Burns v. Burns
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 18, 1996
    ...188 Conn. 736, 740-41, 453 A.2d 1151 (1982)." Ippolito v. Ippolito, 28 Conn.App. 745, 751, 612 A.2d 131, cert. denied, 224 Conn. 905, 615 A.2d 1047 (1992). With respect to other provisions that condition alimony awards, this court has stated that "[t]he trial court does not have to make a d......
  • Get Started for Free