Iron Age Pub. Co. v. Crudup

Decision Date16 January 1889
Citation5 So. 332,85 Ala. 519
PartiesIRON AGE PUB. CO. v. CRUDUP.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from city court of Birmingham; H. A. SHARPE, Judge.

Action by Joseph L. Crudup against the Iron Age Publishing Company for libel published in the Birmingham Age, owned by defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

R H. Pearson, for appellant.

Hewitt, Walker & Porter, for appellee.

CLOPTON J.

The single question in this case, which is an action for libel arises on a demurrer to the complaint. The ground of demurrer is that the publication set forth in the complaint is not libelous per se, and no special damages are averred. A material distinction between verbal and written slander has been long settled, and uniformly maintained, though eminent jurists have been disposed to consider it as not well founded in reason and principle. Many charges are actionable when written or printed which are not when merely spoken. When the words are spoken, and do not impute an indictable offense and are not of such nature as carries a legal presumption of injury to an individual in his office, profession, trade, or business, special damages must be alleged and proved; but when the charge is written or printed, and is libelous per se, special damages need not be averred. In such case, the law infers injury as the natural consequence. The reason of the difference is that words may be spoken in haste or heat of passion, and impressions created soon pass away; but, when written or printed, they are premeditated, more permanent, and calculated to do more injury. The definitions of "libel," as found in the cases, vary somewhat in phraseology, and are more or less comprehensive, as may be called for by the particular charge involved in the case. Generally, any false and malicious publication, when expressed in printing or writing, or by signs or pictures, is a libel, which charges an offense punishable by indictment, or which tends to bring an individual into public hatred, contempt, or ridicule, or charges an act odious and disgraceful in society. This general definition may be said to include whatever tends to injure the character of an individual, blacken his reputation, or imputes fraud, dishonesty, or other moral turpitude, or reflects shame, or tends to put him without the pale of social intercourse. Trimble v. Anderson, 79 Ala. 514; Henderson v. Hale, 19 Ala. 154; Dexter v. Spear, 4 Mason, 115; Adams v. Lawson, 94 Amer. Dec. 455, 460; Solverson v. Peterson, 54 Amer. Rep. 607; 1 Amer. Lead, Cas. 127; 4 Wait, Act. & Def. 282.

In construing the publication complained of, the scope and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • August 30, 1962
    ...the individual into public contempt are libelous per se. White v. Birmingham Post Co., 233 Ala. 547, 172 So. 649; Iron Age Pub. Co. v. Crudup, 85 Ala. 519, 5 So. 332. Further, 'the publication is not to be measured by its effects when subjected to the critical analysis of a trained legal mi......
  • Missouri Pac. Transp. Co. v. Beard
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1937
    ... ... 777, 100 So. 673; Neely v ... Payne, 126 Miss. 854, 89 So. 669; Wrought Iron Range Co ... v. Baltz, 123 Miss. 550, 86 So. 354 ... It is ... settled law that ... 252, 134 So. 164; So. Bell ... T. & T. Co. v. Quick, 167 Miss. 438, 149 So. 107; Pub ... Serv. Corp. v. Watts, 168 Miss. 235, 150 So. 192 ... The ... trial court erred in ... 20, page 1155, secs. 21 and 22, and page ... 1201, sec. 128; Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Crudup, 5 ... So. 332; 17 R. C. L., pages 263-264 ... We ... submit to the court that the ... ...
  • Tidmore v. Mills
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • August 15, 1947
    ...more premeditated and deliberate, and certainly more permanent. In their very nature they are calculated to be more harmful. Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Crudup, supra. Another canon of construction is to attribute to publication the plain and natural meaning in which it appears to have been ......
  • Morse v. Times-Republican Printing Co.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • September 23, 1904
    ...Press v. McDonald, 63 Fed. 239, 11 C. C. A. 155, 26 L. R. A. 531;Post Pub. Co. v. Hallam, 8 C. C. A. 201, 59 Fed. 530;Iron Age Pub. Co. v. Crudup, 85 Ala. 519, 5 South. 332;Dorland v. Patterson, 23 Wend. 422;Arrow v. Bennett, 73 Hun, 81, 25 N. Y. Supp. 1029;Bradley v. Cramer, 59 Wis. 309, 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 40
    • United States
    • Full Court Press The Global #MeToo Movement
    • Invalid date
    ...contempt [they] are libelous per se." White v. Birmingham Post Co., 233 Ala. 547, 172 So. 649 (1937) (USA); Iron Age Pub. Co. v. Crudup, 85 Ala. 519, 5 So. 332 (1889) (USA).[6] Anthony Lewis, Make No Law, supra note 4, 25-27.[7] New York Times Co. v. Sullivan [1964] 376 U.S. 254, at 256.[8]......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT