Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union
| Decision Date | 03 February 1890 |
| Citation | 34 L.Ed. 540,136 U.S. 578,10 S.Ct. 1064 |
| Parties | IRWIN v. SAN FRANCISCO SAVINGS UNION |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Statement of Case from pages 578-580 intentionally omitted] Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for plaintiff in error.
George A. Nourse, for defendant in error.
It is conceded by counsel for plaintiff in error that this case is governed by Wright v. Roseberry, 121 U. S. 488, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 985, and the judgment is therefore, upon the authority of that case, affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
16 cases
-
Pioneer Irr. Dist. v. American Ditch Ass'n
... ... 510; 264 U.S. 456, 44 ... S.Ct. 364, 68 L.Ed. 788; San Francisco Sav. Union v ... Irwin, 28 F. 708; 136 U.S. 578, 10 S.Ct. 1064, 34 ... ...
-
O'DONNELL v. United States
...lands" as here claimed by the United States to void the instant patents to California. The appeal in San Francisco Savings Union v. Irwin (136 U.S. 578, 10 S.Ct. 1064, 34 L.Ed. 540) came before the Supreme Court shortly after Wright v. Roseberry. The United States appeared on the appeal, gi......
-
Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States, 8985.
...121 U.S. 519, 7 S.Ct. 999, 30 L.Ed. 1039. Wright v. Roseberry, supra, was followed and reaffirmed in Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union, 136 U.S. 578, 10 S.Ct. 1064, 34 L.Ed. 540, and Tubbs v. Wilhoit, 138 U.S. 134, 11 S.Ct. 279, 34 L. Ed. In Burfenning v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis &......
-
Simpson v. Ricketts
... ... 940; Wright v ... Roseberry, 121 U.S. 488, 30 L.Ed. 1039; Irwin v. San ... Francisco Savings Union, 136 U.S. 578, 34 L.Ed. 540; ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results