Isbell v. Brown

CourtTexas Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtPer Curiam
CitationIsbell v. Brown, 195 S.W.2d 939 (Tex. App. 1946)
Decision Date08 May 1946
Docket NumberNo. 11628.,11628.
PartiesISBELL, Secretary of State, v. BROWN.

Appeal from Fifty-Seventh District Court, Bexar County; C. K. Quin, Judge.

Action between Claude Isbell, Secretary of State, and E. E. Brown. A judgment was entered in favor of E. E. Brown and Secretary of State appeals. On motion by E. E. Brown to dismiss the appeal.

Motion overruled.

Grover Sellers, Wm. J. R. King, and Geo. W. Barcus, all of Austin, for appellant.

G. Woodson Morris, of San Antonio, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, E. E. Brown, has filed a motion herein praying that the judgment appealed from be affirmed upon certificate, as the transcript was not filed within the time prescribed by Rule 387, R.C.P. The transcript and statement of facts were filed on April 5, 1946.

The judgment of the trial court is before us and it appears therefrom that on January 29, 1946, the trial court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for appellee. The judgment was in Brown's favor and immediately above the trial judge's signature to the draft thereof appear the words: "Dated the 26th day of February, 1946."

By an amendment, effective February 1, 1946, Rule 386 and 306a were changed so as to read as follows:

"Rule 386. Time to File Transcript and Statement of Facts. In appeal or writ of error the appellant shall file the transcript and statement of facts with the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals within sixty days from the rendition of the final judgment or order overruling motion for new trial, or perfection of writ of error; provided, by motion filed before, at, or within a reasonable time, not exceeding fifteen days after the expiration of such sixty day period, showing good cause to have existed within such sixty day period why said transcript and statement of facts could not be so filed, the Court of Civil Appeals may permit the same to be thereafter filed upon such terms as it shall prescribe."

"Rule 306a. Date of Judgment, Etc. Judges are directed to cause, and attorneys and clerks are directed to use their efforts to cause all judgments, decisions, and orders of any kind to be reduced to writing and signed by the trial judge and the date of signing stated therein; but absence of any such showing shall not invalidate any judgment or order.

"In determining the periods within which the various steps of an appeal must be taken, the date of rendition of a judgment or order shall be deemed to be the date upon...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Isbell v. Brown
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 1946
    ...an order revoking plaintiff's real estate dealer's license. From an adverse judgment, defendant appeals. Reversed and rendered. See also 195 S.W.2d 939. Grover Sellers, Wm. J. R. King, and Geo. W. Barcus, all of Austin, for G. Woodson Morris, of San Antonio, for appellee NORVELL, Justice. T......
  • Cox v. Payne, 6080
    • United States
    • Texas Civil Court of Appeals
    • May 15, 1950
    ...trial court's judgment. Relator relies on the provisions of Rule 306a, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and the case of Isbell v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 195 S.W.2d 939, to support her position in the matter. Rule 306a became effective on February 1, 1946, and it was passed for the purpose of c......