Isbell v. State
Decision Date | 02 April 1976 |
Citation | 329 So.2d 140,295 Ala. 407 |
Parties | In re David Michael ISBELL v. STATE. Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL. SC 1760. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
William J. Baxley, Atty.Gen., and Ellis D. Hanan, Asst.Atty.Gen., for the State petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.
Petition of the State by its Atty.Gen. for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Isbell v. State, 57 Ala.App. 444, 329 So.2d 133.
WRIT DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial2 cases
-
Moore v. State, 8 Div. 930
... ... This is permissible, after proper predicate, even though its incidental effect is to impeach the witness's testimony. Miller v. State, 431 So.2d 586 (Ala.Cr.App.1983); Isbell ... ...
-
Bell v. State, 1 Div. 843
... ... This is permissible, after proper predicate, even though its incidental effect is to impeach the witness's testimony. Miller v. State, 431 So.2d 586 (Ala.Crim.App.1983); Isbell v. State, 329 So.2d 133 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 295 Ala. 407, 329 So.2d 140 (1976); Edwards v. State, 51 Ala.App. 433, 286 So.2d 308 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 291 Ala. 777, 286 So.2d 313 (1973), C. Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence § 165.01(7) (3d ed. 1977). Under the theory of ... ...