Isham v. Randle, No. 99-3412
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | KENNEDY |
| Citation | 226 F.3d 691 |
| Parties | (6th Cir. 2000) Dennis Isham, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael Randle, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. Argued: |
| Docket Number | No. 99-3412 |
| Decision Date | 02 August 2000 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
174 cases
-
Sudberry v. Warden, Southern Ohio Corr. Facility, Case No. 1:03-CV-537.
...the statute of limitations is not tolled during the pendency of the period for petitioning for a writ of certiorari. See Isham v. Randle, 226 F.3d 691 (6th Cir.2000). The Court notes further that this case is distinguishable from Henderson v. Luoma, 302 Fed. Appx. 359 (6th Cir.2008). In Hen......
-
Cooey v. Strickland, 05-4057.
...for direct review in the United States Supreme Court has expired. Bronaugh v. Ohio, 235 F.3d 280, 283 (6th Cir.2000); Isham v. Randle, 226 F.3d 691, 694-95 (6th 7. The Sixth Circuit decided in In re Williams on January 12, 2004. The petitioner in that case, whose claim is identical to Cooey......
-
Smith v. Ohio, Dept. of Rehabilitation and Corr., 1:02 CV 690.
...application is a part of the direct review process. 201 F.3d 743, 752-53 (6th Cir.2000). While the Sixth Circuit, in Isham v. Randle, 226 F.3d 691 (6th Cir.2000), treated such applications as collateral attacks, subsequent Sixth Circuit decisions adhered to White's "express holding that Rul......
-
Lopez v. Wilson, 01-3875.
...was part of direct or collateral review for purposes of the AEDPA statute of limitations and its tolling provision. See Isham v. Randle, 226 F.3d 691 (6th Cir.2000); Bronaugh v. Ohio, 235 F.3d 280 (6th Cir.2000); Searcy v. Carter, 246 F.3d 515, 519 (6th Cir.2001); Miller v. Collins, 305 F.3......
Request a trial to view additional results