Italia Foods Inc v. As The Representative Of A Class Of Similarly Situated Persons

Decision Date27 April 2010
Docket NumberNo. 2-08-1148.,2-08-1148.
Citation339 Ill.Dec. 842,399 Ill.App.3d 1038,927 N.E.2d 682
PartiesITALIA FOODS, INC., Indiv. and as the Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.SUN TOURS, INC., d/b/a Hobbit Travel, and Paul Grosso, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Michael D. Richman, Henry Pietrkowski, Reed Smith LLP, Chicago, IL; Charles W. Smith, Smith & LaLuzerne, Ltd., Waukegan, IL, for Paul Grosso, Sun Tours, Inc.

Philip A. Bock, Robert M. Hatch, Bock & Hatch, LLC, Chicago, IL Brian J. Wanca, Ryan M. Kelly, Anderson & Wanca, Rolling Meadows, IL, for Italia Foods, Inc.

Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing

Justice JORGENSEN delivered the opinion of the court:

I. INTRODUCTION

In this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill.2d R. 308), we are asked to answer three certified questions:

(1) Does the language and purpose of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act [ (TCPA) (47 U.S.C. § 227 (2000)) 1] require that the Illinois General Assembly enact enabling legislation before private TCPA claims can be brought and enforced in Illinois state courts?
(2) Are the TCPA claims alleged in this case ‘statutory penalties' under Illinois law?

And if so:

(a) Are those claims assignable under Illinois law?
(b) Does Illinois' two[-]year statutory penalty limitations period [ (735 ILCS 5/13-202 (West 2002)) ] apply to such claims, as opposed to [the federal four-year limitations period for civil actions (28 U.S.C. § 1658 (2000)) ]?
(3) If the claim is not assignable, then should absent class members' putative claims against defendants be treated as tolled when no class representative with proper standing represented the putative class for a 27-month period?”

We answer the first certified question in the negative. Specifically, the Illinois General Assembly need not enact enabling legislation before private TCPA claims can be brought and enforced in Illinois state courts. As to the second certified question, we modify the first two parts of the question and conclude that TCPA claims are remedial and assignable and, alternatively, that (whether or not they are remedial) they are assignable because they do not constitute personal-injury actions. Further, we conclude that we need not answer subsection (b) of the second certified question (concerning the appropriate statute of limitations). Finally, because we conclude that the TCPA claims are assignable, we do not address the third certified question.

II. BACKGROUND

On June 13, 2003, in a class action complaint, Eclipse Manufacturing Company, an Illinois corporation, sued Sun Tours, d/b/a Hobbit Travel, a travel agency, alleging that, in July and August 2002, Hobbit Travel sent Eclipse four unsolicited one-page faxes advertising discounted travel offers. Eclipse further alleged that Hobbit Travel's actions violated the TCPA and the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Fraud Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2002)) and constituted common-law conversion. As to the TCPA claim, Eclipse sought statutory and punitive damages, an injunction, and attorney fees. Eclipse subsequently amended its complaint, adding Hobbit Travel's president, Paul Grosso, as a defendant.

On April 5, 2007, Hobbit Travel moved to dismiss Eclipse's amended complaint, arguing inter alia, that the TCPA claim was not cognizable in Illinois because the operative language of the TCPA-namely, that state court TCPA actions must be “otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a State” (47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3) (2000))-required the Illinois General Assembly to affirmatively opt in to the TCPA's enforcement scheme, which it had not done.2 On July 26, 2007, the trial court denied Hobbit Travel's motion as to the TCPA claim, finding that TCPA claims may be brought in Illinois courts.

On August 30, 2007, Robert Hinman, Eclipse's president and owner, was substituted in for Eclipse as plaintiff by filing a second amended complaint. Hinman alleged that the same four faxes were transmitted to him and not to Eclipse. He further alleged that, on November 30, 2005, several years after receiving Hobbit Travel's faxes, he sold Eclipse's stock to a third party, but expressly retained the right to pursue this TCPA action by virtue of an assignment of that claim (from Eclipse to Hinman).

On October 1, 2007, defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. They challenged Eclipse's assignment of its TCPA claim to Hinman, arguing that the claim was not assignable because it constituted a statutory penalty. Defendants argued that the TCPA's fixed award of $500 per violation (47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3)(B) (2000)) made the claim a statutory penalty under the test this court set forth in McDonald's Corp. v. Levine, 108 Ill.App.3d 732, 738, 64 Ill.Dec. 224, 439 N.E.2d 475 (1982). Defendants thus asserted that Eclipse's assignment of the TCPA claim to Hinman was invalid because the majority rule provides that claims under penal statutes are not assignable. They also argued that Hinman's claims were time-barred because they were brought over five years after each of the four faxes was allegedly received (in July and August 2002).

On January 31, 2008, Italia Foods, Inc., sought leave to substitute in for Hinman and file a third amended complaint, asserting that it had received over 25 faxes from defendants. Over Hobbit Travel's objection, the trial court granted Italia Foods' motion and subsequently allowed Hobbit Travel to file a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint, incorporating its arguments concerning Hinman's invalid assignment from Eclipse.

In the third amended complaint, dated February 28, 2008, Italia Foods alleged that Hobbit Travel sent it 28 unsolicited one-page faxes from June 24, 2005, through April 17, 2007, advertising discount travel deals. Italia Foods further alleged that Hobbit Travel's actions violated the TCPA and Fraud Act and constituted common-law conversion. As to the TCPA claim, Italia Foods sought $500 in statutory damages for each violation, an injunction, and costs.

Hobbit Travel moved to dismiss (735 ILCS 5/2-615, 2-619 (West 2002)) portions of Italia Foods' complaint, arguing that: (1) TCPA claims are not cognizable in Illinois courts for the reasons set forth in Chair King, Inc. v. GTE Mobilnet of Houston, Inc., 184 S.W.3d 707 (Tex.2006) (hereinafter Chair King ); (2) the limitations period for TCPA claims should be measured from the filing of Italia Foods' third amended complaint on February 28, 2008, and not from Eclipse's original complaint (filed June 13, 2003); (3) the applicable limitations period for TCPA claims is two years (735 ILCS 5/13-202 (West 2002)), as opposed to four years (28 U.S.C. § 1658 (2000)) as argued by Italia Foods; and (4) the limitations period was not tolled during the 27-month period from November 30, 2005 (when Eclipse lost standing to bring its claims), to February 28, 2008 (when Italia Foods filed its complaint), as neither Eclipse nor Hinman had standing during this time.

In response, Italia Foods invoked the class tolling rule announced in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 94 S.Ct. 756, 38 L.Ed.2d 713 (1974), arguing that it preserved the otherwise stale claims of putative class members back to June 13, 1999, four years before Eclipse's original complaint. Hobbit Travel replied that the putative class's claims could not be tolled under American Pipe due to the time that lapsed before Italia Foods replaced Hinman as the named plaintiff. According to Hobbit Travel, Eclipse could not have validly assigned its TCPA claim to Hinman under Illinois law, because such a claim constituted a statutory penalty; therefore, a 27-month gap (November 30, 2005, when Eclipse purported to assign its claims to Hinman, to February 28, 2008, when Italia Foods replaced Hinman as the named plaintiff) existed during which no named plaintiff with proper standing represented the putative class.

On August 26, 2008, the trial court denied Hobbit Travel's motion to dismiss Italia Foods' TCPA claim. The court rejected Hobbit Travel's Chair King argument that TCPA claims are not cognizable in Illinois state courts. It further found that Eclipse's TCPA claim was assignable to Hinman under Kleinwort Benson North America, Inc. v. Quantum Financial Services, Inc., 181 Ill.2d 214, 229 Ill.Dec. 496, 692 N.E.2d 269 (1998), which had allowed a company to assign a punitive damages claim to its shareholders. The court further found that the TCPA is not a penal statute and that TCPA claims are subject to the federal four-year statute of limitations (28 U.S.C. § 1658 (2000)). Finally, the court found that the American Pipe tolling doctrine applied and that the class's claims related back to June 13, 1999.

On November 20, 2008, the court granted Hobbit Travel's motion to make Rule 308 findings, and, on December 2, 2008, it entered an order certifying three questions. Hobbit Travel petitioned for leave to appeal to this court, and, on February 25, 2009, we allowed the appeal as to the three certified questions. 3

III. ANALYSIS

A. Jurisdiction of Illinois Courts Over TCPA Claims

The first certified question asks: “Does the language and purpose of the federal [TCPA] require that the Illinois General Assembly enact enabling legislation before private TCPA claims can be brought and enforced in Illinois state courts?” Defendants urge us to answer “yes” to this question and order that Italia Foods' TCPA claim be dismissed with prejudice because it is undisputed that the General Assembly never passed legislation authorizing TCPA suits in this state. Before addressing the parties' specific arguments, we first provide an overview of some constitutional considerations and the statute.

1. Supremacy Clause

The supremacy clause provides: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • The People Of The State Of Ill. v. Hammonds
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 15, 2010
    ... ... 748, 793 N.E.2d 519 (2002)). Similarly, we relaxed the waiver rule when the trial judge ... ...
  • Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • June 3, 2011
    ...law. The appellate court answered the first question in the negative and the second question in the affirmative. 399 Ill.App.3d 1038, 339 Ill.Dec. 842, 927 N.E.2d 682. We allowed leave to appeal (Ill. S.Ct. R. 315 (eff.Feb.26, 2010)). For the following reasons, we agree with the appellate c......
  • Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 26, 2011
    ...under Illinois law. The appellate court answered the first question in the negative and the second question in the affirmative. 399 Ill. App. 3d 1038. We allowed leave to appeal (Ill. S. Ct. R. 315 (eff. Feb. 26, 2010)). For the following reasons, we agree with the appellate court's answer ......
  • Standard Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lay
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 11, 2012
    ...uninsurable on public policy grounds because they resemble punitive damages. One case, Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc., 399 Ill.App.3d 1038, 1066–68, 339 Ill.Dec. 842, 927 N.E.2d 682, 705–06 (2010), found the TCPA was not a penal statute for purposes of the assignability of claims bas......
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter § 5.03 FALSE, MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE ADVERTISING IN THE TRAVEL INDUSTRY
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Travel Law
    • Invalid date
    ...facsimile machines" in violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act). State Law: Illinois: Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc., 927 N.E.2d 682 (Ill. App. 2010) (TCPA claim against Hobbit Travel agency is assignable). Missouri: Travel Travel, Kirkwood, Inc. v. Jen N.Y., Inc., 206 S.W.3d ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT