E.J. Associates, Inc. v. John E. and Aliese Price Foundation, Inc.

CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtHALL; FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL
CitationE.J. Associates, Inc. v. John E. and Aliese Price Foundation, Inc., 515 So.2d 763, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2656 (Fla. App. 1987)
Decision Date18 November 1987
Docket NumberNo. 87-1218,87-1218
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 2656 E.J. ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. The JOHN E. AND ALIESE PRICE FOUNDATION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

Marquin S. Rinard of Wade H. Parsons, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellant.

Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellee.

HALL, Judge.

The appellant, E.J. Associates, Inc., contends that the trial court erred by entering a final summary judgment in favor of the appellee, The John E. and Aliese Price Foundation, Inc. We disagree.

The appellee filed an action to foreclose a promissory note secured by a mortgage upon default by the appellant. The appellant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The motion was orally denied by the trial court with the provision that the appellant had twenty days from the entry of a written order to file an answer. The written order denying the motion was filed on March 20, 1987. On January 26, 1987, the appellee served its motion for summary judgment on the appellant and noticed the hearing for March 23, 1987. On March 19, 1987, the appellee delivered affidavits in support of the motion for summary judgment to the appellant. The affidavits were filed on March 20, 1987, and on the same day the appellant filed motions to strike the affidavits and for a protective order. The court held the scheduled hearing on the motion for summary judgment on March 23, 1987. The appellant neither appeared at the hearing nor filed a motion for a continuance. At the termination of the hearing the trial court granted the appellee's motion for summary judgment. On March 31, 1987, the trial court entered a final judgment of foreclosure. The appellant did not file a motion for rehearing on the summary judgment and seeks to raise the issues of the timeliness of the affidavits and the prematureness of the summary judgment for the first time on appeal.

The appellant contends that the appellee failed to file the affidavits in support of its motion for summary judgment at least twenty days before the hearing on the motion as required by Rule 1.510(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The appellant also contends that the trial court erred in considering the affidavits and in hearing the motion for summary judgment prior to the expiration of the twenty-day period in which the appellant had to file an answer.

As this court stated in Allstate v. Gillespie, 455 So.2d 617 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984):

A litigant may not sit on his hands, fail to voice his objections, and then claim prejudice when a final judgment is entered which may adversely affect him. Furthermore, he may not raise his objections for the first time on appeal. Procedural irregularities to which no objection is made are waived. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dilenge, 312 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), Marsh v. Sarasota County, 97 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957), cert. denied, 101 So.2d 816 (Fla.1958).

455 So.2d at 620.

Even though, as the appellant contends, the appellee's affidavits were untimely filed, the appellant failed to pursue any action...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Williams v. Salem Free Will Baptist Church
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 26, 2001
    ...of due process. See Samuels v. Magnum Realty, 431 So.2d 241, 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see also E.J. Associates, Inc. v. John E. & Aliese Price Found., Inc., 515 So.2d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) ("`Procedural irregularities to which no objection is made are waived.'") (quoting Allstate v. G......
  • Bac Funding Consortium Inc. v. Jean-Jacques
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 12, 2010
    ...properly serve or affirmative defense it might raise" could present an issue of material fact); E.J. Assocs., Inc. v. John E. & Aliese Price Found., Inc., 515 So.2d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (holding that when a plaintiff moves for summary judgment before the defendant files an answer, "t......
  • Verizzo v. Bank of New York
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 3, 2010
    ...must conclusively show that the defendant cannot plead a genuine issue of material fact." E.J. Assocs., Inc. v. John E. & Aliese Price Found., Inc., 515 So.2d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Rule 1.510(c) requires that the movant "serve the motion at least 20 days before the time fixed for the......
  • Head v. Sorensen
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 16, 2017
    ...trial court. Wong v. Crown Equip. Corp. , 676 So.2d 981, 981–92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ; see also E.J. Assocs., Inc. v. John E. & Aliese Price Found., Inc. , 515 So.2d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) ("Procedural irregularities to which no objection is made are waived.").4 In fact, Sorensen provide......
  • Get Started for Free