J & J Baking Co., In re

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationJ & J Baking Co., In re, 236 N.Y.S.2d 17, 18 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Decision Date17 December 1962
PartiesIn the Matter of J & J BAKING CO. Inc., Assignor. I. George Stein, Assignee-Respondent, Aaron Feinberg and George Feinberg, Chattel Mortgagees-Appellants.

Max Feinberg, Brooklyn, for appellant; Bernard Meyerson, Brooklyn, of counsel.

Irving J. Rothenberg, New York City, for respondent; I. George Stein, New York City, of counsel.

Before BELDOCK, P. J., and UGHETTA, KLEINFELD, HILL and RABIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a general assignment proceeding for the benefit of creditors, pursuant to statute (Debtor and Creditor Law, art. 2), Aaron Feinberg and George Feinberg, the holders of a chattel mortgage theretofore executed by the corporate assignor on certain of its equipment, appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 14, 1962, which granted the motion of the assignee Stein to cancel said mortgage; and (2) from so much of an order of said court, dated and entered the same day, as denied their motion for reargument.

Order of June 14, 1962, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Appeal from the order denying reargument dismissed without costs; such an order is not appealable.

It appears that on November 30, 1959, the corporate mortgagor, which in its certificate of incorporation had designated New York County as its principal office, executed a chattel mortgage, in which it recited its principal place of business to be in Queens County. The mortgaged chattels were also located in Queens County. A copy of the chattel mortgage was thereafter filed in Queens County, but not in New York County. In April, 1962 the mortgagor's assignee for the benefit of creditors moved to cancel the mortgage on the ground that it had not been filed in New York County. The motion was granted.

In our opinion, where the mortgaged chattels are located outside the City of New York, § 232 of the Lien Law requires filing where the mortgagor resides, which in the case of a corporate mortgagor, means its principal office designated in the certificate of incorporation (Matter of Norma Footwear [Leather Bd.], 2 A.D.2d 24, 153 N.Y.S.2d 80, affd. 2 N.Y.2d 887, 161 N.Y.S.2d 143, 141 N.E.2d 628). However, where the mortgaged chattels are located in the City of New York, the same statute requires filing where the mortgator 'alleges to reside' and where the property is situated. Since the mortgator alleged in...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex