J. W Paxson Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland County
Decision Date | 20 December 1912 |
Docket Number | 1,671. |
Citation | 201 F. 656 |
Parties | J. W. PAXSON CO. v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY. [1] |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Martin V. Bergen, Jr., and Howard M. Long, both of Philadelphia Pa., for plaintiff in error.
Walter H. Bacon and Roscoe C. Ward, Co. Sol., both of Bridgeton N.J., for defendant in error.
Before GRAY, BUFFINGTON, and McPHERSON, Circuit Judges.
This was an action in tort, originally instituted in the New Jersey Supreme Court and afterwards removed by the defendant to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey, for the recovery of $20,000 damages, for the negligent destruction by defendant of a portion of plaintiff's drawbridge over the Maurice river, in Cumberland county, N.J., August 30, 1909. As the case was tried, upon stipulation by the attorneys for the respective parties, before the court without a jury, under the provisions of section 649 of the Revised Statutes (U.S. Comp St. 1901, p. 525), the facts of the case and conclusions of law arrived at can best be understood by quoting the opinion of the court as a whole. It is as follows:
'In addition to the cost of such construction, the plaintiff seeks to recover the amount of certain fees for two meetings of the members of the board of chosen freeholders, and for meetings of its committee which had in charge the superintendence of the construction of the new span and fender; also for the cost of advertising for contractors' bids and other incidental expenses. The items just referred to cannot, however, be allowed because they are not claimed in the declaration and because, moreover, they are not the direct natural and proximate result of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bp Exploration & Oil v. Moran Mid-Atlantic Corp.
...course, cites only cases that apply depreciation and betterment, arguing for the second principle. 13. In J.W. Paxson Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 201 F. 656 (3d Cir. 1912), the Third Circuit addressed the appropriate damages after a tug crashed into a draw bridge, knocking a piece o......
-
Freeport Sulphur Co. v. S/S Hermosa
...for new replacements and contain equally broad dicta are distinguishable from the present case. In Paxson Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland County, 3 Cir. 1912, 201 F. 656, 663, the replacement structure was made of materials inferior to that of the old structure, and it was ......
-
BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. Moran Mid-Atlantic Corp., Civil Action No. 97-5059 (D. N.J. 6/28/2001)
...course, cites only cases that apply depreciation and betterment, arguing for the second principle. 13. In J.W. Paxson Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 201 F. 656 (3d Cir. 1912), the Third Circuit addressed the appropriate damages after a tug crashed into a draw bridge, knocking a piece o......
-
State v. F. W. Fitch Co.
... ... Highway 69 was constructed by Decatur County in ... 1921. In 1927 the powers and duties of ... board of supervisors by statute, or implied as ... Collieries, Inc., 9 Tenn.App. 225; J. W. Paxson Co. v. Board ... of Chosen Freeholders, 3 Cir., ... ...